National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Department of Health Sciences, Centre for Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Arch Dis Child. 2018 Apr;103(4):363-370. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313414. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
To determine the trajectory of cognitive test scores from infancy to adulthood in individuals born extremely preterm compared with term-born individuals.
A prospective, population-based cohort study.
276 maternity units in the UK and Ireland.
315 surviving infants born less than 26 completed weeks of gestation recruited at birth in 1995 and 160 term-born classroom controls recruited at age 6.
Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition (age 2.5); Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (ages 6/11); Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence-Second Edition (age 19).
The mean cognitive scores of extremely preterm individuals over the period were on average 25.2 points below their term-born peers (95% CI -27.8 to -22.6) and remained significantly lower at every assessment. Cognitive trajectories in term-born boys and girls did not differ significantly, but the scores of extremely preterm boys were on average 8.8 points below those of extremely preterm girls (95% CI -13.6 to -4.0). Higher maternal education elevated scores in both groups by 3.2 points (95% CI 0.8 to 5.7). Within the extremely preterm group, moderate/severe neonatal brain injury (mean difference: -10.9, 95% CI -15.5 to -6.3) and gestational age less than 25 weeks (mean difference: -4.4, 95% CI -8.4 to -0.4) also had an adverse impact on cognitive function.
There is no evidence that impaired cognitive function in extremely preterm individuals materially recovers or deteriorates from infancy through to 19 years. Cognitive test scores in infancy and early childhood reflect early adult outcomes.
比较极早产儿和足月出生的个体,从婴儿期到成年期认知测试分数的变化轨迹。
前瞻性、基于人群的队列研究。
英国和爱尔兰的 276 家产科单位。
1995 年出生时招募的 315 名存活且胎龄不足 26 周的极早产儿和 160 名胎龄足月的课堂对照组。
贝利婴幼儿发展量表第二版(2.5 岁);考夫曼儿童评估成套测验(6/11 岁);韦氏简明智力量表第二版(19 岁)。
极早产儿在整个研究期间的平均认知评分比足月出生的个体低 25.2 分(95%置信区间:-27.8 至 -22.6),且在每次评估时均显著较低。胎龄足月的男孩和女孩的认知轨迹没有显著差异,但极早产儿男孩的评分平均比极早产儿女孩低 8.8 分(95%置信区间:-13.6 至 -4.0)。较高的母亲教育程度使两组的分数分别提高了 3.2 分(95%置信区间:0.8 至 5.7)。在极早产儿组中,中度/重度新生儿脑损伤(平均差异:-10.9,95%置信区间:-15.5 至 -6.3)和胎龄小于 25 周(平均差异:-4.4,95%置信区间:-8.4 至 -0.4)也对认知功能产生了不良影响。
没有证据表明极早产儿的认知功能在婴儿期到成年期之间会有明显的恢复或恶化。婴儿期和幼儿期的认知测试分数反映了成年后的结果。