Suppr超能文献

足月前出生的大于胎龄儿的认知和学业成绩:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

Cognitive and academic outcomes of large-for-gestational-age babies born at early term: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhao Xuan, Poskett Alice, Stracke Marie, Quenby Siobhan, Wolke Dieter

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Lifespan Health and Wellbeing Group, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Feb;104(2):288-301. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15001. Epub 2024 Oct 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Early induction of labor (37-38 gestational weeks) in large-for-gestational-age infants may reduce perinatal risks such as shoulder dystocia, but it may also increase the long-term risks of reduced cognitive abilities. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the cognitive and academic outcomes of large-for-gestational-age children born early term vs full term (combined or independent exposures).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database under the registration no. CRD42024528626. Five databases were searched from their inception until March 27, 2024, without language restrictions. Studies reporting childhood cognitive or academic outcomes after early term or large-for-gestational-age births were included. Two reviewers independently screened the selected studies. One reviewer extracted the data, and the other double-checked the data. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. In addition to narrative synthesis, meta-analyses were conducted where possible.

RESULTS

Of the 2505 identified articles, no study investigated early-term delivery in large-for-gestational-age babies. Seventy-six studies involving 11 460 016 children investigated the effects of either early-term delivery or large-for-gestational-age. Children born at 37 weeks of gestation (standard mean difference, -0.13; 95% confidence interval, -0.21 to -0.05), but not at 38 weeks (standard mean difference, -0.04; 95% confidence interval, -0.08 to 0.002), had lower cognitive scores than those born at 40 weeks. Large-for-gestational-age children had slightly higher cognitive scores than appropriate-for-gestational-age children (standard mean difference, 0.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.11). Similar results were obtained using the outcomes of either cognitive impairment or academic performance.

CONCLUSIONS

No study has investigated the combined effect of early-term delivery on cognitive scores in large-for-gestational-age babies. Early-term delivery may have a very small detrimental effect on cognitive scores, whereas being large for gestational age may have a very small benefit. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials or observational studies is required.

摘要

引言

对于大于胎龄儿,在孕37 - 38周进行早期引产可能会降低诸如肩难产等围产期风险,但也可能增加认知能力下降的长期风险。本系统评价旨在评估早期足月出生与足月出生(合并或独立暴露)的大于胎龄儿童的认知和学业结局。

材料与方法

该方案已在PROSPERO数据库中注册,注册号为CRD42024528626。检索了五个数据库,从其创建到2024年3月27日,无语言限制。纳入报告早期足月或大于胎龄出生后儿童认知或学业结局的研究。两名评审员独立筛选选定的研究。一名评审员提取数据,另一名对数据进行复核。使用纽卡斯尔 - 渥太华质量评估量表评估偏倚风险。除了叙述性综合分析外,还尽可能进行了荟萃分析。

结果

在识别出的2505篇文章中,没有研究调查大于胎龄儿的早期足月分娩情况。76项涉及11460016名儿童的研究调查了早期足月分娩或大于胎龄的影响。孕37周出生的儿童(标准平均差,-0.13;95%置信区间,-0.21至-0.05),但孕38周出生的儿童(标准平均差,-0.04;95%置信区间,-0.08至0.002)的认知得分低于孕40周出生的儿童。大于胎龄儿童的认知得分略高于适于胎龄儿童(标准平均差,0.06;95%置信区间,0.01 - 0.11)。使用认知障碍或学业成绩的结局也得到了类似结果。

结论

尚无研究调查早期足月分娩对大于胎龄儿认知得分的综合影响。早期足月分娩可能对认知得分有非常小的不利影响,而大于胎龄可能有非常小的益处。然而,需要随机对照试验或观察性研究的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d22/11782071/501c372e594b/AOGS-104-288-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验