Stivers Tanya, Timmermans Stefan
Department of Sociology, UCLA, USA.
Sociol Health Illn. 2017 Nov;39(8):1542-1556. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12614.
Genomic tests such as exome sequencing have recently become an option for diagnosing patients. The tests allow clinical geneticists to sequence the majority of patients' disease causing genetic variants. As a new technology, exome sequencing confronts the question of what the benefit is of this increased genetic information. Against a narrow perspective of clinical utility that emphasises tangible improvements in a patient's disease management, professional organisations have argued that genomic sequencing should be considered beneficial if it helps families and society. Based on video-recorded observations of the return of exome sequencing results to parents of a child with disabilities in the clinic and in-depth interviews with these parents, we examine how genomic test results become actionable in the clinical encounter. We find that parents and clinicians marshal exome results beyond biomedical diagnostic and management goals to address questions about guilt for causing the disabilities and to secure access to disability-related services. We argue that genomic actionability rests on the interaction between the biological characteristics of genetic results and the predicaments facing parents of children with disabilities.
诸如外显子组测序等基因组检测最近已成为诊断患者的一种选择。这些检测使临床遗传学家能够对大多数患者的致病基因变异进行测序。作为一项新技术,外显子组测序面临着这样一个问题:这种增加的基因信息有什么益处。与强调在患者疾病管理方面有切实改善的狭义临床效用观点不同,专业组织认为,如果基因组测序对家庭和社会有帮助,就应被视为有益的。基于对在诊所向外显子组测序结果返回给残疾儿童父母的过程进行视频记录观察以及对这些父母进行深入访谈,我们研究了基因组检测结果在临床接触中如何变得可操作。我们发现,父母和临床医生将外显子组结果用于超出生物医学诊断和管理目标的目的,以解决对导致残疾的内疚问题,并确保获得与残疾相关的服务。我们认为,基因组的可操作性取决于基因结果的生物学特征与残疾儿童父母所面临的困境之间的相互作用。