Yunes Alexandra, Luco Matías, Pattillo Juan Carlos
Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Proyecto Epistemonikos, Santiago, Chile.
Proyecto Epistemonikos, Santiago, Chile; Departamento de Neonatología, División de Pediatría, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. Email:
Medwave. 2017 Nov 15;17(9):e7081. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2017.09.7081.
The timing of surgical repair in patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia has been a controversial topic over the years, and there is still no agreement as to whether immediate repair or late surgery with preoperative stabilization is preferable.
To answer this question we used Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach.
We identified four systematic reviews including 38 studies overall, of which two were randomized trials. We concluded it is not clear whether immediate surgical repair in congenital diaphragmatic hernia increases mortality or decreases hospitalization days compared to late repair because the certainty of evidence is very low.
多年来,先天性膈疝患者手术修复的时机一直是一个有争议的话题,对于是立即修复还是术前稳定后进行延迟手术更可取,目前仍未达成共识。
为回答这个问题,我们使用了Epistemonikos,这是最大的健康领域系统评价数据库,通过筛选多个信息来源进行维护,包括MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane等。我们从系统评价中提取数据,重新分析原始研究的数据,进行荟萃分析,并使用GRADE方法生成结果总结表。
我们确定了四项系统评价,总共包括38项研究,其中两项为随机试验。我们得出结论,与延迟修复相比,先天性膈疝立即进行手术修复是否会增加死亡率或缩短住院天数尚不清楚,因为证据的确定性非常低。