Suppr超能文献

内镜下硬膜外激光减压术与经椎间孔内镜下激光环锯成形术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的前瞻性随机试验。

Endoscopic Epidural Laser Decompression Versus Transforaminal Epiduroscopic Laser Annuloplasty for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Prospective, Randomized Trial.

机构信息

Spine Health Wooridul Hospital, Daegu, South Korea.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2017 Nov;20(7):663-670.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lumbar radicular pain often results from lumbar disc herniation, spinal stenosis, or degenerative spondylolisthesis. Minimally invasive disc decompression procedures, such as nucleo-annuloplasty or epiduroscopic neural decompression by laser, have been devised to treat such pain.

OBJECTIVE

The short-term outcomes of disc decompression by endoscopic epidural laser decompression (EELD) or transforaminal epiduroscopic laser annuloplasty (TELA) were compared in patients with lumbar radicular pain due to disc herniation.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized, prospective trial.

SETTING

The Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine at Spine Health Wooridul Hospital in Daegu, Korea.

METHODS

A total of 97 patients were enrolled in this study; 48 patients underwent EELD and 49 underwent TELA. The pain relief was evaluated at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-procedure via the numeric rating scale (NRS). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was recorded at baseline and at the final follow-up. Postoperative wound pain was assessed over a 24-hour period. Complications and side effects were also recorded, as were operative times (from local anesthetic infiltration at entry sites to suturing of skin).

RESULTS

At post-treatment months 1, 3, and 6 the mean pain scores of patients were significantly lower (relative to pre-treatment baseline) regardless of the procedure used. However, the mean pain scores did not differ significantly by procedure (EELD vs TELA). As well, the number of patients who obtained relief from their pain and needed analgesics was not statistically significant. The irrigation volume was significantly higher in the TELA group. Two patients undergoing TELA procedures experienced headache during the procedures; however, no serious complications such as bleeding, dural/neural injuries, or infection were recorded for either group.

LIMITATION

The observed significant reductions in pain (from baseline) lacked secondary outcome substantiation and given the mid follow-up period, no long-term follow-up results were monitored.

CONCLUSION

Both EELD and TELA provide similar outcomes and are reasonable treatment options for carefully selected patients with lower back or radicular pain.

KEY WORDS

Epiduroscopy, laser, annuloplasty, disc, herniation, TELA.

摘要

背景

腰椎神经根痛常由腰椎间盘突出症、椎管狭窄症或退行性脊椎滑脱症引起。微创椎间盘减压术,如核成形术或激光经皮内镜神经减压术,已被设计用于治疗此类疼痛。

目的

比较内镜下硬膜外激光减压术(EELD)和经椎间孔内镜激光环锯术(TELA)治疗腰椎间盘突出症引起的腰椎神经根痛的短期疗效。

研究设计

随机、前瞻性试验。

地点

韩国大邱脊柱健康 Wooridul 医院麻醉与疼痛医学科。

方法

本研究共纳入 97 例患者,其中 48 例行 EELD,49 例行 TELA。通过数字评分量表(NRS)在基线和术后 1、3 和 6 个月评估疼痛缓解情况。在基线和最终随访时记录 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)。术后 24 小时内评估切口疼痛。记录并发症和不良反应,以及手术时间(从局部麻醉浸润进入部位到缝合皮肤)。

结果

无论采用何种手术方式,治疗后 1、3 和 6 个月时患者的平均疼痛评分均显著低于(与治疗前基线相比)。然而,手术方式之间的平均疼痛评分无显著差异(EELD 与 TELA)。同样,获得疼痛缓解且需要镇痛的患者数量也无统计学意义。TELA 组的冲洗量明显较高。2 例接受 TELA 手术的患者在手术过程中出现头痛;然而,两组均未发生严重并发症,如出血、硬脊膜/神经损伤或感染。

局限性

观察到的疼痛显著减轻(与基线相比)缺乏次要结局的证实,由于随访时间较短,没有监测到长期随访结果。

结论

EELD 和 TELA 为下腰痛或神经根痛的患者提供了相似的治疗效果,是合理的治疗选择。

关键词

硬膜外镜检查;激光;环锯术;椎间盘;突出症;TELA。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验