• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

墨尔本的创新性城市林业治理?探究“绿色营造”作为一种基于自然的解决方案。

Innovative urban forestry governance in Melbourne?: Investigating "green placemaking" as a nature-based solution.

机构信息

University of Copenhagen, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark.

Urban Forester, City of Melbourne, 120 Swanston Street, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.

出版信息

Environ Res. 2018 Feb;161:158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.005
PMID:29149679
Abstract

A nature-based approach to climate resilience aims to challenge and re-frame conventional environmental management methods by refocusing solutions from technological strategies to socio-ecological principles such as human well-being and community-based governance models, thereby improving and legitimizing the delivery of ecosystem services (ES). There are, however, many challenges to applying a socio-ecological agenda to urban climate resilience and thereby re-framing ES delivery as community and people focused, a knowledge gap extensively outlined in the environmental governance literature. In this paper, we aim to contribute to this re-assesment of urban environmental governance by examining the City of Melbourne's approach to urban re-naturing governance from a place-based perspective. Here we focus on the city's internationally-acclaimed urban forest strategy (UFS), investigating how and to which extent the governance arrangements embedded within the UFS draw strength from diverse perspectives and allow for institutional arrangements that support "situated" reflexive decision making and co-creation. We find that Melbourne's UFS governance process fosters green placemaking by re-focusing climate adaptation solutions from technological strategies to situated socio-ecological principles such as human well-being and community-based decision making. In this sense, this case provides valuable insight for the broader UGI governance field regarding the opportunities and challenges associated with a socio-cultural approach to urban re-naturing and ES delivery.

摘要

基于自然的方法旨在通过将解决方案从技术策略重新聚焦到社会生态原则,如人类福祉和基于社区的治理模式,来挑战和重新构建传统的环境管理方法,从而改善和使生态系统服务(ES)的提供合法化。然而,将社会生态议程应用于城市气候适应能力并将 ES 提供重新定位为以社区和人为重点存在许多挑战,这是环境治理文献中广泛概述的知识差距。在本文中,我们旨在通过从基于地点的角度考察墨尔本市对城市自然化治理的方法,为城市环境治理的重新评估做出贡献。在这里,我们专注于该市享有国际声誉的城市森林战略(UFS),研究 UFS 中嵌入的治理安排如何以及在何种程度上从不同的角度汲取力量,并为支持“情境”反思性决策和共同创造的制度安排提供支持。我们发现,墨尔本的 UFS 治理过程通过将气候适应解决方案从技术策略重新聚焦到人类福祉和基于社区的决策等情境社会生态原则,促进了绿色场所营造。从这个意义上说,这个案例为更广泛的 UGI 治理领域提供了有关社会文化方法在城市再自然化和 ES 提供方面的机会和挑战的宝贵见解。

相似文献

1
Innovative urban forestry governance in Melbourne?: Investigating "green placemaking" as a nature-based solution.墨尔本的创新性城市林业治理?探究“绿色营造”作为一种基于自然的解决方案。
Environ Res. 2018 Feb;161:158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
2
Adopting public values and climate change adaptation strategies in urban forest management: A review and analysis of the relevant literature.城市森林管理中公共价值观与气候变化适应策略的采纳:相关文献综述与分析
J Environ Manage. 2015 Dec 1;164:215-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
3
Challenges for tree officers to enhance the provision of regulating ecosystem services from urban forests.树木管理人员在加强城市森林调节生态系统服务供给方面面临的挑战。
Environ Res. 2017 Jul;156:97-107. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.020. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
4
City to city learning and knowledge exchange for climate resilience in southern Africa.城市间的学习和知识交流促进南部非洲的气候适应能力。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 24;15(1):e0227915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227915. eCollection 2020.
5
Public trust and knowledge in the context of emerging climate-adaptive forestry policies.新兴气候适应型林业政策背景下的公众信任和知识。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Jul 15;242:474-486. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.065. Epub 2019 May 7.
6
Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people.有利于生物多样性和人类的景观。
Science. 2018 Oct 19;362(6412). doi: 10.1126/science.aau6020.
7
Urban green infrastructure: A review on valuation toolkits from an urban planning perspective.城市绿色基础设施:从城市规划角度看评估工具包综述。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Aug 1;267:110603. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110603. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
8
Influences of Land Policy on Urban Ecological Corridors Governance: A Case Study from Shanghai.土地政策对城市生态廊道治理的影响:以上海为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 8;19(15):9747. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159747.
9
Tales of transforming cities: Transformative climate governance capacities in New York City, U.S. and Rotterdam, Netherlands.城市转型的故事:美国纽约市和荷兰鹿特丹市的气候治理转型能力。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Feb 1;231:843-857. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.043. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
10
Mapping supply of and demand for ecosystem services to assess environmental justice in New York City.将生态系统服务的供给和需求进行映射,以评估纽约市的环境公平性。
Ecol Appl. 2021 Sep;31(6):e02390. doi: 10.1002/eap.2390. Epub 2021 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Rituals as Nature-Based Governance of reciprocity between people and nature.作为人与自然之间基于自然的互惠治理的仪式。
Open Res Eur. 2024 Aug 7;4:66. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.17206.2. eCollection 2024.
2
Nature-based solutions in spatial planning and policies for climate change adaptation: A literature review.基于自然的解决方案在空间规划和气候变化适应政策中的应用:文献综述。
Ambio. 2024 Nov;53(11):1599-1617. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02052-1. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
3
The spatial heterogeneity of urban green space distribution and configuration in Lilongwe City, Malawi.
马拉维利隆圭市城市绿地分布与格局的空间异质性
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 24;19(7):e0307518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307518. eCollection 2024.
4
Participatory intention and behavior towards riparian peri-urban forests management; an extended theory of planned behavior application.对河岸城郊森林管理的参与意愿和行为;计划行为理论的扩展应用
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 26;15:1372354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1372354. eCollection 2024.
5
Animals and Cities: A Reflection on Their Potential in Innovating Nature-Based Solutions.动物与城市:关于它们在创新基于自然的解决方案中的潜力的思考。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Feb 21;14(5):680. doi: 10.3390/ani14050680.
6
What types of green space disrupt a lonelygenic environment? A cohort study.哪些类型的绿地会破坏孤独基因环境?一项队列研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2023 May;58(5):745-755. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02381-0. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
7
Planning nature-based solutions: Principles, steps, and insights.规划基于自然的解决方案:原则、步骤与见解。
Ambio. 2021 Aug;50(8):1446-1461. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01365-1. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
8
Forests in common: Learning from diversity of community forest arrangements in Europe.共同的森林:从欧洲社区森林安排的多样性中学习。
Ambio. 2021 Feb;50(2):448-464. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01377-x. Epub 2020 Sep 13.