Suppr超能文献

与其他计划分娩地点相比,在分娩中心计划分娩的女性的经历。荷兰分娩中心研究的结果。

Experiences of women who planned birth in a birth centre compared to alternative planned places of birth. Results of the Dutch Birth Centre Study.

作者信息

Hitzert Marit, Hermus Marieke A A, Scheerhagen Marisja, Boesveld Inge C, Wiegers Therese A, van den Akker-van Marle M Elske, van Dommelen Paula, van der Pal-de Bruin Karin M, de Graaf Johanna P

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Child Health, TNO, PO Box 2215, 2316 ZL Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands; Midwifery Practice Trivia, Werkmansbeemd 2, 4907 EW Oosterhout, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Midwifery. 2016 Sep;40:70-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to assess the experiences with maternity care of women who planned birth in a birth centre and to compare them to alternative planned places of birth, by using the responsiveness concept of the World Health Organization.

DESIGN

this study is a cross-sectional study using the ReproQ questionnaire filled out eight to ten weeks after birth. The primary outcome was responsiveness of birth care. Secondary outcomes included overall grades for birth care and experiences with the birth centre services. Regression analyses were performed to compare experiences among the planned places of birth. The study is part of the Dutch Birth Centre Study.

SETTING

the women were recruited by 82 midwifery practices in the Netherlands, within the study period 1 August 2013 and 31 December 2013.

PARTICIPANTS

a total of 2162 women gave written consent to receive the questionnaire and 1181 (54.6%) women completed the questionnaire.

MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS

women who planned to give birth at a birth centre: (1) had similar experiences as the women who planned to give birth in a hospital receiving care of a community midwife. (2) had significantly less favourable experiences than the women who planned to give birth at home. Differences during birth were seen on the domains dignity (OR=1.58, 95% CI=1.09-2.27) and autonomy (OR=1.77, 95% CI=1.25-2.51), during the postpartum period on the domains social considerations (OR=1.54, 95% CI=1.06-2.25) and choice and continuity (OR=1.43, 95% CI=1.00-2.03). (3) had significantly better experiences than the women who planned to give birth in a hospital under supervision of an obstetrician. Differences during birth were seen on the domains dignity (OR=0.51, 95% CI=0.31-0.81), autonomy (OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.35-1.00), confidentiality (OR=0.57, 95% CI=0.36-0.92) and social considerations (OR=0.47, 95% CI=0.28-0.79). During the postpartum period differences were seen on the domains dignity (OR=0.61, 95% CI=0.38-0.98), autonomy (OR=0.52, 95% CI=0.31-0.85) and basic amenities (OR=0.52, 95% CI=0.30-0.88). More than 80% of the women who received care in a birth centre rated the facilities, the moment of arrival/departure and the continuity in the birth centre as good.

KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

in the last decades, many birth centres have been established in different countries, including the United Kingdom, Australia, Sweden and the Netherlands. For women who do not want to give birth at home a birth centre is a good choice: it leads to similar experiences as a planned hospital birth. Emphasis should be placed on ways to improve autonomy and prompt attention for women who plan to give birth in a birth centre as well as on the improvement of care in case of a referral.

摘要

目的

运用世界卫生组织的响应性概念,评估计划在分娩中心分娩的女性的孕产护理体验,并将其与其他计划中的分娩地点进行比较。

设计

本研究为横断面研究,采用产后八至十周填写的ReproQ问卷。主要结果是分娩护理的响应性。次要结果包括分娩护理的总体评分以及对分娩中心服务的体验。进行回归分析以比较不同计划分娩地点的体验。该研究是荷兰分娩中心研究的一部分。

背景

在2013年8月1日至2013年12月31日的研究期间,荷兰的82家助产机构招募了这些女性。

参与者

共有2162名女性书面同意接收问卷,1181名(54.6%)女性完成了问卷。

测量与结果

计划在分娩中心分娩的女性:(1)与计划在接受社区助产士护理的医院分娩的女性有相似的体验。(2)与计划在家分娩的女性相比,体验明显较差。在分娩期间,在尊严(比值比=1.58,95%置信区间=1.09 - 2.27)和自主性(比值比=1.77,95%置信区间=1.25 - 2.51)方面存在差异;在产后期间,在社会关怀(比值比=1.54,95%置信区间=1.06 - 2.25)以及选择与连续性(比值比=1.43,95%置信区间=1.00 - 2.03)方面存在差异。(3)与计划在产科医生监督下的医院分娩的女性相比,体验明显更好。在分娩期间,在尊严(比值比=0.51,95%置信区间=0.31 - 0.81)、自主性(比值比=0.59,95%置信区间=0.35 - 1.00)、保密性(比值比=0.57,95%置信区间=0.36 - 0.92)和社会关怀(比值比=0.47,95%置信区间=0.28 - 0.79)方面存在差异。在产后期间,在尊严(比值比=0.61,95%置信区间=0.38 - 0.98)、自主性(比值比=0.52,95%置信区间=0.31 - 0.85)和基本设施(比值比=0.52,95%置信区间=0.30 - 0.88)方面存在差异。在分娩中心接受护理的女性中,超过80%对分娩中心的设施、到达/离开时间以及连续性给予了好评。

关键结论及对实践的启示

在过去几十年里,包括英国、澳大利亚、瑞典和荷兰在内的不同国家建立了许多分娩中心。对于不想在家分娩的女性来说,分娩中心是个不错的选择:它带来的体验与计划中的医院分娩相似。应着重于改善自主性的方法,以及对计划在分娩中心分娩的女性给予及时关注,同时改进转诊情况下的护理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验