Department of Psychology, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2018 Jan;26(1):75-80. doi: 10.1002/erv.2569. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
Psychometric investigations of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) have generally not supported the original scale structure. The present study tested an alternative brief factor structure in two large Portuguese samples: (1) a non-clinical sample of N = 4117 female students and (2) a treatment-seeking sample of N = 609 patients diagnosed with eating disorders. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a poor fit for the original EDE-Q structure in both the non-clinical and the clinical samples but revealed a good fit for the alternative 7-item 3-factor structure (dietary restraint, shape/weight overvaluation and body dissatisfaction). Factor loadings were invariant across samples and across the different specific eating disorder diagnoses in the clinical sample. These confirmatory factor analysis findings, which replicate findings from studies with diverse predominately overweight/obese samples, supported a modified 7-item, 3-factor structure for the EDE-Q. The reliable findings across different non-clinical and clinical eating disorder groups provide confidence regarding the potential utility of this brief version. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.
心理计量学研究表明,饮食失调检查表(EDE-Q)通常不支持原始量表结构。本研究在两个大型葡萄牙语样本中检验了替代的简短因素结构:(1)N=4117 名女性学生的非临床样本和(2)N=609 名被诊断为饮食失调的治疗寻求患者样本。验证性因子分析表明,在非临床和临床样本中,原始 EDE-Q 结构的拟合度均较差,但替代的 7 项 3 因素结构(饮食限制、体型/体重高估和身体不满)拟合度较好。因子负荷在样本间和临床样本中的不同特定饮食失调诊断间是不变的。这些验证性因子分析结果与来自不同以超重/肥胖为主的样本的研究结果一致,支持 EDE-Q 的改良 7 项 3 因素结构。在不同的非临床和临床饮食失调组中可靠的发现,为这个简短版本的潜在效用提供了信心。版权所有 © 2017 约翰威利父子有限公司和饮食失调协会。