• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化洪灾缓解效益:通过 RASOR 平台进行的建筑物级损害评估。

Quantification of flood risk mitigation benefits: A building-scale damage assessment through the RASOR platform.

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Florence, Via di S. Marta 3, 50139 Firenze, Italy.

CIMA Research Foundation, University Campus, Italy.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2018 Feb 1;207:92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.017. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.017
PMID:29154012
Abstract

Flood risk mitigation usually requires a significant investment of public resources and cost-effectiveness should be ensured. The assessment of the benefits of hydraulic works requires the quantification of (i) flood risk in absence of measures, (ii) risk in presence of mitigation works, (iii) investments to achieve acceptable residual risk. In this work a building-scale is adopted to estimate direct tangible flood losses to several building classes (e.g. residential, industrial, commercial, etc.) and respective contents, exploiting various sources of public open data in a GIS environment. The impact simulations for assigned flood hazard scenarios are computed through the RASOR platform which allows for an extensive characterization of the properties and their vulnerability through libraries of stage-damage curves. Recovery and replacement costs are estimated based on insurance data, market values and socio-economic proxies. The methodology is applied to the case study of Florence (Italy) where a system of retention basins upstream of the city is under construction to reduce flood risk. Current flood risk in the study area (70 km) is about 170 Mio euros per year without accounting for people, infrastructures, cultural heritage and vehicles at risk. The monetary investment in the retention basins is paid off in about 5 years. However, the results show that although hydraulic works are cost-effective, a significant residual risk has to be managed and the achievement of the desired level of acceptable risk would require about 1 billion euros of investments.

摘要

减轻洪灾风险通常需要大量公共资源的投入,因此应确保成本效益。水力工程效益的评估需要量化(i)无措施时的洪灾风险,(ii)减轻措施存在时的风险,(iii)实现可接受剩余风险的投资。在这项工作中,采用了建筑物规模来估算几类建筑物(例如住宅、工业、商业等)及其各自内容的直接有形洪水损失,利用 GIS 环境中的各种公共开放数据源。通过 RASOR 平台计算指定洪水危险情景的影响模拟,该平台允许通过阶段损害曲线库对属性及其脆弱性进行广泛的特征描述。基于保险数据、市场价值和社会经济指标来估算恢复和更换成本。该方法应用于佛罗伦萨(意大利)的案例研究,该市上游正在建设一系列蓄洪池以降低洪灾风险。研究区域(70 平方公里)目前的洪水风险约为每年 1.7 亿欧元,不包括风险人群、基础设施、文化遗产和车辆。蓄洪池的货币投资在大约 5 年内收回。然而,结果表明,尽管水力工程具有成本效益,但仍需要管理重大剩余风险,并且要实现期望的可接受风险水平,还需要大约 10 亿欧元的投资。

相似文献

1
Quantification of flood risk mitigation benefits: A building-scale damage assessment through the RASOR platform.量化洪灾缓解效益:通过 RASOR 平台进行的建筑物级损害评估。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Feb 1;207:92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.017. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
2
Flood management: prediction of microbial contamination in large-scale floods in urban environments.洪水管理:城市环境中大规模洪水的微生物污染预测。
Environ Int. 2011 Jul;37(5):1019-29. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.03.015. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
3
A multi-disciplinary approach to evaluate pluvial floods risk under changing climate: The case study of the municipality of Venice (Italy).多学科方法评估气候变化下的雨洪风险:以意大利威尼斯市为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Aug 15;562:1031-1043. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.150. Epub 2016 May 6.
4
Flood risk modelling based on tangible and intangible urban flood damage quantification.基于有形和无形城市洪水损失量化的洪水风险建模。
Water Sci Technol. 2010;62(1):189-95. doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.243.
5
Assessment and mitigation of tangible flood damages driven by climate change in a tropical city: Hat Yai Municipality, southern Thailand.受气候变化驱动的热带城市有形洪灾损失评估与缓解:泰国南部合艾市。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 1;789:147983. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147983. Epub 2021 May 24.
6
Urban flood mitigation planning for Guwahati: A case of Bharalu basin.古瓦哈蒂城市洪涝缓解规划:以巴拉鲁流域为例。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Jan 15;206:1155-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.079. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
7
A Framework for Flood Risk Analysis and Benefit Assessment of Flood Control Measures in Urban Areas.城市地区防洪措施的洪水风险分析与效益评估框架
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Aug 5;13(8):787. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13080787.
8
Flood risk management in Sint Maarten - A coupled agent-based and flood modelling method.圣马丁的洪水风险管理 - 一种基于代理和洪水模型的耦合方法。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Oct 15;248:109317. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109317. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
9
Multiparameter flood hazard, socioeconomic vulnerability and flood risk assessment for densely populated coastal city.沿海人口密集城市的多参数洪水灾害、社会经济易损性和洪水风险评估。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 15;344:118405. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118405. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
10
Flood insurance in Canada: implications for flood management and residential vulnerability to flood hazards.加拿大的洪水保险:对洪水管理及住宅遭受洪水灾害脆弱性的影响
Environ Manage. 2015 Mar;55(3):603-15. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0416-6. Epub 2014 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
When does risk become residual? A systematic review of research on flood risk management in West Africa.风险何时会变成残余风险?对西非洪水风险管理研究的系统综述。
Reg Environ Change. 2021;21(3):84. doi: 10.1007/s10113-021-01826-7. Epub 2021 Aug 25.