School of Psychology, University of Leeds.
Department of Psychology, University of York.
Dev Psychol. 2018 Feb;54(2):240-253. doi: 10.1037/dev0000427. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
Recent research has demonstrated that, when instructed to prioritize a serial position in visual working memory (WM), adults are able to boost performance for this selected item, at a cost to nonprioritized items (e.g., Hu, Hitch, Baddeley, Zhang, & Allen, 2014). While executive control appears to play an important role in this ability, the increased likelihood of recalling the most recently presented item (i.e., the recency effect) is relatively automatic, possibly driven by perceptual mechanisms. In 3 Experiments 7 to 10 year-old's ability to prioritize items in WM was investigated using a sequential visual task (total N = 208). The relationship between individual differences in WM and performance on the experimental task was also explored. Participants were unable to prioritize the first (Experiments 1 and 2) or final (Experiment 3) item in a 3-item sequence, while large recency effects for the final item were consistently observed across all experiments. The absence of a priority boost across 3 experiments indicates that children may not have the necessary executive resources to prioritize an item within a visual sequence, when directed to do so. In contrast, the consistent recency boosts for the final item indicate that children show automatic memory benefits for the most recently encountered stimulus. Finally, for the baseline condition in which children were instructed to remember all 3 items equally, additional WM measures predicted performance at the first and second but not the third serial position, further supporting the proposed automaticity of the recency effect in visual WM. (PsycINFO Database Record
最近的研究表明,当被指示在视觉工作记忆 (WM) 中优先考虑一个序列位置时,成年人能够提高所选项目的表现,但这是以牺牲非优先项目为代价的 (例如,Hu、Hitch、Baddeley、Zhang 和 Allen,2014)。虽然执行控制似乎在这种能力中起着重要作用,但最近呈现的项目(即近因效应)更有可能被回忆起来,这是相对自动的,可能是由感知机制驱动的。在实验 3 中,通过一项顺序视觉任务 (总共 N = 208) 研究了 7 至 10 岁儿童在 WM 中优先处理项目的能力。还探讨了 WM 个体差异与实验任务表现之间的关系。参与者无法在 3 项序列中优先考虑第一项(实验 1 和 2)或最后一项(实验 3),而在所有实验中,最后一项的近因效应始终很明显。3 项实验中均未出现优先级提升,这表明当被指示这样做时,儿童可能没有必要的执行资源来在视觉序列中优先处理项目。相比之下,最后一项的一致近因提升表明,儿童对最近遇到的刺激表现出自动记忆优势。最后,对于儿童被指示同等记住所有 3 项的基线条件,额外的 WM 测量预测了第一和第二但不是第三序列位置的表现,进一步支持了视觉 WM 中近因效应的自动性假设。