Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, United States.
Prev Med. 2018 Feb;107:90-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
Despite changes to breast cancer screening guidelines intended to decrease screening in younger and older women, mammography rates remain high. We investigated physician attitudes towards screening younger and older women. Surveys were mailed to US primary care providers and gynecologists between May and September 2016 (871/1665, 52.3% adjusted response rate). We assessed physician (1) attitudes towards screening younger (45-49years) and older (75+ years) women and (2) recommendations for routine mammography. We used exploratory factor analysis to identify underlying themes among physician attitudes and created measures standardized to a 5-point scale. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we examined associations between physician attitudes and screening recommendations. Attitudes identified with factor analysis included: potential regret, expectations, and discordant guidelines (referred to as potential regret), patient-related hazards due to screening, physician limitations and uncertainty, and concerns about rationing care. Gynecologists had higher levels of potential regret compared to internists. In adjusted analyses, physicians with increasing potential regret (1-point increment on 5-point scale) had higher odds of recommending mammography to younger (OR 8.68; 95% CI 5.25-14.36) and older women (OR 4.62; 95% CI 3.50-6.11). Increasing concern for patient-related hazards was associated with decreased odds of recommending screening to older women (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.56-0.83). Physicians were more motivated by potential regret in recommending screening for younger and older women than by concerns for patient-related hazards in screening. Addressing physicians' most salient concerns, such as fear of missing cancer diagnoses and malpractice, may present an important opportunity to improving delivery of guideline-concordant cancer screening.
尽管乳腺癌筛查指南有所改变,旨在减少年轻和老年女性的筛查,但乳房 X 光检查率仍然很高。我们调查了医生对筛查年轻和老年女性的态度。调查于 2016 年 5 月至 9 月间邮寄给美国初级保健提供者和妇科医生(1665 名中的 871 名,调整后的回应率为 52.3%)。我们评估了医生(1)对筛查年轻(45-49 岁)和老年(75 岁以上)女性的态度,以及(2)对常规乳房 X 光检查的建议。我们使用探索性因素分析来确定医生态度的潜在主题,并创建了标准化的 5 点量表测量。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型,研究了医生态度与筛查建议之间的关联。因素分析确定的态度包括:潜在的遗憾、期望和不一致的指南(称为潜在的遗憾)、因筛查而导致的患者相关危害、医生的局限性和不确定性,以及对配给护理的担忧。与内科医生相比,妇科医生的潜在遗憾程度更高。在调整后的分析中,潜在遗憾程度较高的医生(5 点量表上增加 1 分),建议对年轻(比值比 8.68;95%置信区间 5.25-14.36)和老年女性(比值比 4.62;95%置信区间 3.50-6.11)进行乳房 X 光检查的可能性更大。对患者相关危害的担忧增加与对老年女性进行筛查的可能性降低有关(比值比 0.68;95%置信区间 0.56-0.83)。与对患者相关危害的担忧相比,医生更倾向于因潜在遗憾而推荐对年轻和老年女性进行筛查。解决医生最关心的问题,如担心漏诊癌症和医疗事故,可能为改善符合指南的癌症筛查提供一个重要机会。