• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估采样和储存程序对粪便微生物群群落结构的保存效果:一种简单的家庭厕纸收集方法。

Evaluation of sampling and storage procedures on preserving the community structure of stool microbiota: A simple at-home toilet-paper collection method.

作者信息

Al Kait F, Bisanz Jordan E, Gloor Gregory B, Reid Gregor, Burton Jeremy P

机构信息

Departments of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Canadian Centre for Human Microbiome and Probiotics, London, Ontario, Canada; Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.

Canadian Centre for Human Microbiome and Probiotics, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Biochemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Microbiol Methods. 2018 Jan;144:117-121. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.mimet.2017.11.014
PMID:29155236
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The increasing interest on the impact of the gut microbiota on health and disease has resulted in multiple human microbiome-related studies emerging. However, multiple sampling methods are being used, making cross-comparison of results difficult. To avoid additional clinic visits and increase patient recruitment to these studies, there is the potential to utilize at-home stool sampling. The aim of this pilot study was to compare simple self-sampling collection and storage methods.

METHODS

To simulate storage conditions, stool samples from three volunteers were freshly collected, placed on toilet tissue, and stored at four temperatures (-80, 7, 22 and 37°C), either dry or in the presence of a stabilization agent (RNAlater®) for 3 or 7days. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing by Illumina, the effect of storage variations for each sample was compared to a reference community from fresh, unstored counterparts. Fastq files may be accessed in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive: Bioproject ID PRJNA418287.

RESULTS

Microbial diversity and composition were not significantly altered by any storage method. Samples were always separable based on participant, regardless of storage method suggesting there was no need for sample preservation by a stabilization agent.

DISCUSSION

In summary, if immediate sample processing is not feasible, short term storage of unpreserved stool samples on toilet paper offers a reliable way to assess the microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

摘要

背景

对肠道微生物群对健康和疾病影响的兴趣日益增加,导致多项与人类微生物组相关的研究不断涌现。然而,目前使用的采样方法多种多样,使得结果的交叉比较变得困难。为了避免额外的门诊就诊并增加参与这些研究的患者数量,利用家庭粪便采样具有可行性。本试点研究的目的是比较简单的自我采样收集和存储方法。

方法

为模拟存储条件,从三名志愿者新鲜采集粪便样本,置于卫生纸 上,分别在四种温度(-80、7、22 和 37°C)下干燥或在存在稳定试剂(RNAlater®)的情况下存储 3 天或 7 天。通过 Illumina 进行 16S rRNA 基因测序,将每个样本存储变化的影响与来自新鲜、未存储样本的参考群落进行比较。Fastq 文件可在 NCBI 序列读取存档中获取:生物项目 ID PRJNA418287。

结果

任何存储方法均未显著改变微生物多样性和组成。无论存储方法如何,样本始终可根据参与者进行区分,这表明无需使用稳定试剂保存样本。

讨论

总之,如果无法立即进行样本处理,将未保存的粪便样本短期存储在卫生纸上,为通过 16S rRNA 基因测序评估微生物群组成提供了一种可靠的方法。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of sampling and storage procedures on preserving the community structure of stool microbiota: A simple at-home toilet-paper collection method.评估采样和储存程序对粪便微生物群群落结构的保存效果:一种简单的家庭厕纸收集方法。
J Microbiol Methods. 2018 Jan;144:117-121. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
2
Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.收集非胎粪粪便在粪便潜血卡片上是婴儿粪便微生物组研究的有效方法。
Microbiome. 2017 Sep 5;5(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0333-z.
3
Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles.系统分析采样区域和储存方法对粪便肠道微生物组和代谢组谱的影响。
mSphere. 2020 Jan 8;5(1):e00763-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00763-19.
4
Comparison of stool versus rectal swab samples and storage conditions on bacterial community profiles.粪便样本与直肠拭子样本以及储存条件对细菌群落谱的比较。
BMC Microbiol. 2017 Mar 31;17(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-0983-9.
5
Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.不同粪便储存方案对微生物多样性和组成影响的评估:一项初步研究。
BMC Microbiol. 2019 Jun 28;19(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1519-2.
6
Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.一种方便参与者的粪便收集方法用于微生物组分析的可靠性:迈向大样本量研究的一步。
BMC Microbiol. 2018 Sep 6;18(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1249-x.
7
Effect of room temperature transport vials on DNA quality and phylogenetic composition of faecal microbiota of elderly adults and infants.室温运输管对老年人和婴儿粪便微生物群的 DNA 质量和系统发育组成的影响。
Microbiome. 2016 May 10;4(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0164-3.
8
An alternative storage method for characterization of the intestinal microbiota through next generation sequencing.一种通过下一代测序对肠道微生物群进行表征的替代存储方法。
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2018 Nov 29;60:e77. doi: 10.1590/S1678-9946201860077.
9
Interpersonal Variations in Gut Microbiota Profiles Supersedes the Effects of Differing Fecal Storage Conditions.肠道微生物组谱的人际差异超过粪便储存条件差异的影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 26;8(1):17367. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35843-0.
10
[Variations of gut microbiome composition under different preservation solutions and periods].不同保存溶液和保存时间下肠道微生物群组成的变化
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2020 Dec 25;36(12):2525-2540. doi: 10.13345/j.cjb.200475.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal storage time and temperature of human oral samples to minimize microbiome changes: A scoping review.将人类口腔样本的储存时间和温度优化至微生物组变化最小化:一项范围综述。
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2024 Dec;60:220-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2024.05.001. Epub 2024 Oct 20.
2
Assessment of fecal bacterial viability and diversity in fresh and frozen fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) product in horses.评估新鲜和冷冻粪便微生物群移植(FMT)产品中粪便细菌的活力和多样性。
BMC Vet Res. 2024 Jul 10;20(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04166-w.
3
Assessing the impact of pregnancy and birth factors on the maternal and infant microbiota.
评估妊娠和分娩因素对母婴微生物群的影响。
Microbiome Res Rep. 2023 Jul 24;2(4):29. doi: 10.20517/mrr.2023.32. eCollection 2023.
4
Multi-site microbiota alteration is a hallmark of kidney stone formation.多部位微生物群落改变是肾结石形成的一个标志。
Microbiome. 2023 Nov 25;11(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01703-x.
5
Fecal microbiota transplantation plus anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in advanced melanoma: a phase I trial.粪便微生物群移植联合抗 PD-1 免疫疗法治疗晚期黑色素瘤:一项 I 期临床试验。
Nat Med. 2023 Aug;29(8):2121-2132. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02453-x. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
6
Assessment of the impact of intravenous antibiotics treatment on gut microbiota in patients: Clinical data from pre-and post-cardiac surgery.评估静脉用抗生素治疗对心脏手术前后患者肠道微生物群的影响:临床数据。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Jan 19;12:1043971. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1043971. eCollection 2022.
7
New perspectives on an old grouping: The genomic and phenotypic variability of and the implications for calcium oxalate stone prevention.旧有分组的新视角:[具体内容]的基因组和表型变异性及其对草酸钙结石预防的影响。 (注:原文中“of and”部分缺失具体内容)
Front Microbiol. 2022 Dec 21;13:1011102. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1011102. eCollection 2022.
8
Comparing invasive and noninvasive faecal sampling in wildlife microbiome studies: A case study on wild common cranes.比较野生动物微生物组研究中的侵袭性和非侵袭性粪便采样:以野生普通鹤为例。
Mol Ecol Resour. 2023 Feb;23(2):359-367. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13708. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
9
The standardisation of the approach to metagenomic human gut analysis: from sample collection to microbiome profiling.人类肠道宏基因组分析方法的标准化:从样本采集到微生物组分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 19;12(1):8470. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12037-3.
10
Fecal microbiota transplantation is safe and tolerable in patients with multiple sclerosis: A pilot randomized controlled trial.粪便微生物群移植在多发性硬化症患者中是安全且可耐受的:一项试点随机对照试验。
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2022 May 11;8(2):20552173221086662. doi: 10.1177/20552173221086662. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.