Paden E P, Matthies M L, Novak M A
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
J Speech Hear Disord. 1989 Feb;54(1):94-100. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5401.94.
Subjects with documented histories of frequent or persistent otitis media with effusion (OME) who were judged to be below age level phonologically prior to placement of pressure equalization (PE) tubes were reassessed at 4-month intervals. Group A (n = 22) subjects caught up with their peers by the age of 4 years; Group B (n = 14) subjects' progress was delayed and phonologic intervention was advised. At initial testing the two groups were found to differ significantly in scores on postvocalic singleton obstruent omission, velar deviation, and stridency deletion. Elapsed time between initial diagnosis of OME and beginning of the first remission of 6 months or more also differed significantly, as did scores on the first phonologic reassessment. Subject scores on initial phonologic adequacy, retest adequacy, and elapsed time from diagnosis to remission appropriately classified all but 2 subjects by group. A formula is provided that appears to make early prediction of eventual need for phonologic intervention a practical possibility.
对有记录的复发性或持续性中耳积液(OME)病史且在放置鼓膜通气管(PE)之前语音水平低于同龄人水平的受试者,每隔4个月进行重新评估。A组(n = 22)受试者在4岁时赶上了同龄人;B组(n = 14)受试者的进展延迟,建议进行语音干预。在初始测试中,发现两组在后元音单辅音省略、软腭偏差和尖锐音删除的得分上有显著差异。从OME初始诊断到首次缓解6个月或更长时间的间隔时间也有显著差异,首次语音重新评估的得分也是如此。受试者在初始语音充分性、重新测试充分性以及从诊断到缓解的间隔时间方面的得分,除2名受试者外,能将所有受试者正确分类到相应组。提供了一个公式,该公式似乎使早期预测最终对语音干预的需求成为一种实际可能。