Tovar-Cuellar W, Galván-Villamarín F, Ortiz-Morales J
Unidad de Ortopedia, Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Unidad de Ortopedia, Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed). 2018 Jan-Feb;62(1):55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
Determine the complications related to the different techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients under 18 years old.
Systematic review using the databases Medline, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Embase (until July 2016), additional studies were included conducting a search of the references of previous studies. The terms included in the search were: «cruciate», «ligament», «anterior», «immature», «complications», «outcome», «acl reconstruction»,« cruciate ligament anterior reconstruction», «children», «child», «infants», «adolescent», «open physis», «growth plate» and «skeletally immature».
A number of 73 studies were included; 1300 patients in total, average age 13 years, 70% were male, medial and lateral meniscal lesions in 26% and 30% respectively. Eleven cases of length discrepancy (0,8%): 4 cases were presented with physeal-sparing techniques (1,4%), 3 cases with partial physeal-sparing techniques (2.2%) and 4 cases were presented with transphyseal techniques (0.4%). There were 22 cases of axis deviation: 6 cases with physeal-sparing techniques (2%), 3 cases with partial physeal-sparing techniques and 13 cases with transphyseal techniques (1.4%). The use of allograft achilles tendon allograft and fascia lata was associated with increased length discrepancy and axis deviation (25%). There was no difference according to Tanner.
The different anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques in patients under 18 years old had low complications related to lower limb growth, arthrofibrosis and review. There was a higher percentage of cases of length discrepancy and axis deviation with physeal-sparing techniques than with the other surgical techniques. The evidence level studies cannot determine causality.
确定18岁以下患者前交叉韧带重建不同技术相关的并发症。
使用Medline、Cochrane系统评价数据库和Embase数据库(截至2016年7月)进行系统评价,通过检索既往研究的参考文献纳入其他研究。检索词包括:“十字韧带”、“韧带”、“前”、“未成熟”、“并发症”、“结局”、“前交叉韧带重建”、“前十字韧带重建”、“儿童”、“小孩”、“婴儿”、“青少年”、“开放骨骺”、“生长板”和“骨骼未成熟”。
共纳入73项研究;总计1300例患者,平均年龄13岁,70%为男性,内侧和外侧半月板损伤分别占26%和30%。11例肢体长度差异(0.8%):4例采用保留骨骺技术(1.4%),3例采用部分保留骨骺技术(2.2%),4例采用经骨骺技术(0.4%)。有22例轴线偏移:6例采用保留骨骺技术(2%),3例采用部分保留骨骺技术,13例采用经骨骺技术(1.4%)。使用同种异体跟腱移植和阔筋膜张肌移植与肢体长度差异和轴线偏移增加相关(25%)。根据 Tanner分期无差异。
18岁以下患者不同的前交叉韧带重建技术与下肢生长、关节纤维化和翻修相关的并发症发生率较低。与其他手术技术相比,保留骨骺技术导致肢体长度差异和轴线偏移的病例百分比更高。证据水平研究无法确定因果关系。