Bai Yang, Xia Xiaoyu, Wang Yong, Guo Yongkun, Yang Yi, He Jianghong, Li Xiaoli
a Institute of Electrical Engineering , Yanshan University , Qinhuangdao , China.
b Department of Neurosurgery , PLA Army General Hospital , Beijing , China.
Int J Neurosci. 2018 Jul;128(7):587-594. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2017.1403440. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
A transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol (20 min, 2 mA, anodal electrode at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and cathodal electrode at the right supraorbital area) was applied in patients with different degrees of disorders of consciousness (DoC). Although previous research indicates that it could improve patients' coma recovery scale-revised (CRS-R) scores, the brain's electrophysiological responses to tDCS are still unclear. Therefore, the present study was performed to explore the underlying brain responses of patients in a minimally conscious state (MCS) and an unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) to tDCS modulation.
Seventeen patients with DoC were recruited in a sham controlled crossover study receiving real and sham tDCS. EEG coherence was used to measure functional connectivity changes induced by the tDCS modulation.
After real tDCS modulation, the fronto-parietal coherence significantly increased in the theta band and decreased in the gamma band in the MCS group. No significant changes were found in the UWS group. The coherence responses significantly correlated with the patients' baseline CRS-R scores. No distinct alteration occurred in the sham session for either the MCS or UWS patients.
The coherence responses to the present tDCS protocol may be a tool for diagnosing MCS versus UWS, as they may be a crucial cause of the different clinical effects in the two states.
对不同程度意识障碍(DoC)患者应用经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)方案(20分钟,2毫安,阳极电极置于左侧背外侧前额叶皮层,阴极电极置于右侧眶上区域)。尽管先前研究表明其可提高患者的昏迷恢复量表修订版(CRS-R)评分,但大脑对tDCS的电生理反应仍不清楚。因此,本研究旨在探讨处于最小意识状态(MCS)和无反应觉醒综合征(UWS)的患者对tDCS调节的潜在脑反应。
在一项接受真实和假tDCS的假对照交叉研究中招募了17名DoC患者。脑电图相干性用于测量由tDCS调节引起的功能连接变化。
在真实tDCS调节后,MCS组中θ频段的额顶叶相干性显著增加,γ频段的额顶叶相干性显著降低。UWS组未发现显著变化。相干性反应与患者的基线CRS-R评分显著相关。MCS或UWS患者在假刺激阶段均未出现明显改变。
对当前tDCS方案的相干性反应可能是诊断MCS与UWS的一种工具,因为它们可能是两种状态下不同临床效果的关键原因。