Wilson Cristina G, Nusbaum Amy T, Whitney Paul, Hinson John M
a Department of Psychology , Washington State University , Pullman , WA , USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2018 Aug;40(6):586-594. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2017.1398311. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
Older adults are often worse than younger adults at adapting to changing situational demands, and this difference is commonly attributed to an age-related decline in acquiring and updating information. Previous research on aging and cognitive flexibility has used measures that require adapting to novel associations learned during a laboratory task (e.g., choice X led to positive outcomes but now leads to negative outcomes). However, in everyday life people must frequently overcome associations based on preexisting beliefs and biases (e.g., you like to eat cake, but your doctor said to limit your sugar intake). The goal of the present study was to examine possible age-differences in overcoming a preexisting bias and determine whether age-related changes in the acquisition and updating of information influence this form of flexibility.
Older (n = 20) and younger (n = 20) adults completed a novel task in which repeated choices were made between a sure option (gain or loss) and one of two risky options that were initially ambiguous. Optimal performance required overcoming a framing bias toward being risk seeking to avoid a sure loss and risk averse when offered a sure gain. Probe questions assessed knowledge of choice outcomes, while skin conductance assessed physiological reactions to choices and choice outcomes.
Both older and younger adults demonstrated flexibility by reducing the impact of bias over trials, but younger adults had better performance overall. Age-differences were associated with distinct aspects of processing. Young adults had more precise knowledge of choice outcomes and developed skin conductance responses in anticipation of bad choices that were not apparent in older adults.
Older adults showed significant improvement over trials in their ability to decrease bias-driven choices, but younger showed greater flexibility. Age-differences in task performance were based on differences in learning and corresponding representations of task-relevant information.
老年人在适应不断变化的情境需求方面通常比年轻人表现更差,这种差异通常归因于与年龄相关的获取和更新信息能力的下降。先前关于衰老与认知灵活性的研究使用了一些测量方法,这些方法要求适应在实验室任务中学习到的新关联(例如,选择X曾带来积极结果,但现在会导致消极结果)。然而,在日常生活中,人们必须经常克服基于既有信念和偏见的关联(例如,你喜欢吃蛋糕,但医生说要限制糖分摄入)。本研究的目的是检验在克服既有偏见方面可能存在的年龄差异,并确定与年龄相关的信息获取和更新变化是否会影响这种灵活性形式。
老年人(n = 20)和年轻人(n = 20)完成了一项新颖的任务,在一个确定选项(收益或损失)和两个最初模糊的风险选项之一之间进行重复选择。最佳表现需要克服偏向冒险的框架偏差,以避免确定的损失,并在有确定收益时规避风险。探测性问题评估对选择结果的了解,而皮肤电传导评估对选择及选择结果的生理反应。
老年人和年轻人都通过在试验过程中减少偏差的影响表现出了灵活性,但年轻人总体表现更好。年龄差异与加工的不同方面相关。年轻人对选择结果有更精确的了解,并且在预期不良选择时会产生皮肤电传导反应,而老年人中则不明显。
老年人在减少偏差驱动的选择能力方面在试验过程中有显著改善,但年轻人表现出更大的灵活性。任务表现的年龄差异基于学习以及任务相关信息相应表征的差异。