Wang Xiaoxia, Zhou Xiaoyan, Dai Qin, Ji Bing, Feng Zhengzhi
Department of Basic Psychology, School of Psychology, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Department of Clinical Psychology, Chongqing City Mental Health Center, Chongqing, China.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Oct 31;11:516. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00516. eCollection 2017.
People engage in emotion regulation in service of motive goals (typically, to approach a desired emotional goal or avoid an undesired emotional goal). However, how motives (goals) in emotion regulation operate to shape the regulation of emotion is rarely known. Furthermore, the modulatory role of motivation in the impaired reappraisal capacity and neural abnormalities typical of depressed patients is not clear. Our hypothesis was that (1) approach and avoidance motivation may modulate emotion regulation and the underlying neural substrates; (2) approach/avoidance motivation may modulate emotion regulation neural abnormalities in depressed patients. Twelve drug-free depressed patients and fifteen matched healthy controls reappraised emotional pictures with approach/avoidant strategies and self-rated their emotional intensities during fMRI scans. Approach/avoidance motivation was measured using Behavioral Inhibition System and Behavioral Activation System (BIS/BAS) Scale. We conducted whole-brain analyses and correlation analyses of regions of interest to identify alterations in regulatory prefrontal-amygdala circuits which were modulated by motivation. Depressed patients had a higher level of BIS and lower levels of BAS-reward responsiveness and BAS-drive. BIS scores were positively correlated with depressive severity. We found the main effect of motivation as well as the interactive effect of motivation and group on the neural correlates of emotion regulation. Specifically, hypoactivation of IFG underlying the group differences in the motivation-related neural correlates during reappraisal may be partially explained by the interaction between group and reappraisal. Consistent with our prediction, dlPFC and vmPFC was differentially between groups which were modulated by motivation. Specifically, the avoidance motivation of depressed patients could predict the right dlPFC activation during decreasing positive emotion, while the approach motivation of normal individuals could predict the right vmPFC activation during decreasing negative emotion. Notably, striatal regions were observed when examining the neural substrates underlying the main effect of motivation (lentiform nucleus) and the interactive effect between motivation and group (midbrain). Our findings highlight the modulatory role of approach and avoidance motivation in cognitive reappraisal, which is dysfunctional in depressed patients. The results could enlighten the CBT directed at modifying the motivation deficits in cognitive regulation of emotion.
人们为了实现动机目标(通常是接近期望的情绪目标或避免不期望的情绪目标)而进行情绪调节。然而,情绪调节中的动机(目标)如何运作以塑造情绪调节却鲜为人知。此外,动机在抑郁症患者典型的重新评价能力受损和神经异常中的调节作用尚不清楚。我们的假设是:(1)趋近和回避动机可能调节情绪调节及其潜在的神经基质;(2)趋近/回避动机可能调节抑郁症患者情绪调节的神经异常。12名未服用药物的抑郁症患者和15名匹配的健康对照在功能磁共振成像扫描期间,使用趋近/回避策略重新评价情绪图片,并对自己的情绪强度进行自评。使用行为抑制系统和行为激活系统(BIS/BAS)量表测量趋近/回避动机。我们进行了全脑分析和感兴趣区域的相关分析,以确定受动机调节的前额叶-杏仁核调节回路的改变。抑郁症患者的BIS水平较高,BAS奖励反应性和BAS驱力水平较低。BIS得分与抑郁严重程度呈正相关。我们发现了动机的主效应以及动机与组别的交互作用对情绪调节神经关联的影响。具体而言,在重新评价过程中,与动机相关的神经关联的组间差异背后的额下回激活不足,可能部分由组别与重新评价之间的相互作用来解释。与我们的预测一致,背外侧前额叶皮层和腹内侧前额叶皮层在不同组之间存在差异,且受动机调节。具体而言,抑郁症患者的回避动机可以预测在积极情绪降低期间右侧背外侧前额叶皮层的激活,而正常个体的趋近动机可以预测在消极情绪降低期间右侧腹内侧前额叶皮层的激活。值得注意的是,在检查动机主效应(豆状核)和动机与组别的交互作用(中脑)的潜在神经基质时,观察到了纹状体区域。我们的研究结果突出了趋近和回避动机在认知重新评价中的调节作用,而认知重新评价在抑郁症患者中功能失调。这些结果可能为旨在改善情绪认知调节中动机缺陷的认知行为疗法提供启示。