Fehlings Michael G, Wilson Jefferson R, Harrop James S, Kwon Brian K, Tetreault Lindsay A, Arnold Paul M, Singh Jeffrey M, Hawryluk Gregory, Dettori Joseph R
Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Global Spine J. 2017 Sep;7(3 Suppl):116S-137S. doi: 10.1177/2192568217706366. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review to assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of high-dose methylprednisolone sodium succinate (MPSS) versus no pharmacological treatment in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).
A systematic search was performed in PubMed and the Cochrane Collaboration Library for literature published between January 1956 and June 17, 2015. Included studies were critically appraised, and Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation methods were used to determine the overall quality of evidence for primary outcomes. Previous systematic reviews on this topic were collated and evaluated using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews scoring system.
The search yielded 723 citations, 13 of which satisfied inclusion criteria. Among these, 6 were primary research articles and 7 were previous systematic reviews. Based on the included research articles, there was moderate evidence that the 24-hour NASCIS II (National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Studies) MPSS regimen has no impact on long-term neurological recovery when all postinjury time points are considered. However, there is also moderate evidence that subjects receiving the same MPSS regimen within 8 hours of injury achieve an additional 3.2 points (95% confidence interval = 0.10 to 6.33; = .04) of motor recovery compared with patients receiving placebo or no treatment.
Although safe to administer, a 24-hour NASCIS II MPSS regimen, when all postinjury time points are considered, has no impact on indices of long-term neurological recovery. When commenced within 8 hours of injury, however, a high-dose 24-hour regimen of MPSS confers a small positive benefit on long-term motor recovery and should be considered a treatment option for patients with SCI.
系统评价与荟萃分析。
本研究的目的是进行一项系统评价,以评估大剂量琥珀酸钠甲泼尼龙(MPSS)与非药物治疗相比,对创伤性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的有效性和安全性。
在PubMed和Cochrane协作图书馆中进行系统检索,以查找1956年1月至2015年6月17日发表的文献。对纳入的研究进行严格评估,并使用推荐评估、发展与评价等级方法来确定主要结局的证据总体质量。使用多重系统评价评分系统对先前关于该主题的系统评价进行整理和评估。
检索共得到723条引文,其中13条符合纳入标准。其中,6篇为原始研究文章,7篇为先前的系统评价。基于纳入的研究文章,有中等证据表明,当考虑所有伤后时间点时,24小时的美国国立急性脊髓损伤研究(NASCIS)II的MPSS方案对长期神经功能恢复没有影响。然而,也有中等证据表明,与接受安慰剂或未接受治疗的患者相比,在损伤后8小时内接受相同MPSS方案的受试者运动功能恢复额外增加3.2分(95%置信区间=0.10至6.33;P=0.04)。
尽管MPSS给药安全,但当考虑所有伤后时间点时,24小时的NASCIS II的MPSS方案对长期神经功能恢复指标没有影响。然而,在损伤后8小时内开始使用时,大剂量24小时的MPSS方案对长期运动功能恢复有小的积极益处,应被视为SCI患者的一种治疗选择。