Alarcon Pablo, Fèvre Eric M, Muinde Patrick, Murungi Maurice K, Kiambi Stella, Akoko James, Rushton Jonathan
Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Leverhulme Centre for Integrated Research in Agriculture and Health, London, United Kingdom.
Front Vet Sci. 2017 Oct 25;4:171. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00171. eCollection 2017.
Urban livestock keeping in developing cities have an important role in food security and livelihoods but can also pose a significant threat to the environment and health of urban dwellers. The aim of this study was to identify the different livestock systems in Nairobi, their supply chains, and their management and food safety risks. Seven focus group discussions with livestock production officers in charge of each major Nairobi sub-county were conducted. Data were collected on the type of systems existing for each livestock species and their supply chains, disease management, food safety risks, and general husbandry and gender factors. Supply chain flow diagrams and thematic analysis of the data was done. Results of the study show a large variability of livestock keeping in Nairobi. The majority were small scale with: <5 dairy cows, 1-6 dairy goats, <10 small ruminants, <20 pigs, 200-500 broilers, 300-500 layers, <10 indigenous chickens, or <20 rabbits. Beef keeping was mainly described as a "by the way" system or done by traders to fatten animals for 3 month. Supply chain analysis indicated that most dairy farmers sold milk directly to consumers due to "lack of trust" of these in traders. Broiler and pig farmers sold mainly to traders but are dependent on few large dominating companies for their replacement or distribution of products. Selling directly to retailers or consumers (including own consumption), with backyard slaughtering, were important chains for small-scale pig, sheep and goat, and indigenous chicken keepers. Important disease risk practices identified were associated with consumption of dead and sick animals, with underground network of brokers operating for ruminant products. Qualified trained health managers were used mainly by dairy farmers, and large commercial poultry and pig farmers, while use of unqualified health managers or no treatment were common in small-scale farming. Control of urban livestock keepers was reported difficult due to their "feeling of being outlaws," "lack of trust" in government, "inaccessibility" in informal settlements, "lack of government funding," or "understaffing." Findings are useful for designing policies to help to control urban livestock production and minimize its associated health and environment risks.
在发展中城市进行城市家畜养殖对粮食安全和生计具有重要作用,但也可能对城市居民的环境和健康构成重大威胁。本研究的目的是确定内罗毕不同的家畜养殖系统、它们的供应链以及管理和食品安全风险。与负责内罗毕各主要次县的家畜生产官员进行了七次焦点小组讨论。收集了关于每种家畜物种现有养殖系统的类型及其供应链、疾病管理、食品安全风险以及一般饲养和性别因素的数据。绘制了供应链流程图并对数据进行了主题分析。研究结果表明,内罗毕的家畜养殖情况差异很大。大多数养殖规模较小,奶牛存栏量<5头、奶山羊1 - 6只、小型反刍动物<10只、猪<20头、肉鸡200 - 500只、蛋鸡300 - 500只、本地鸡<10只或兔子<20只。肉牛养殖主要被描述为一种“顺带”养殖方式,或者由贸易商进行,将动物育肥3个月。供应链分析表明,由于奶农对贸易商“缺乏信任”,大多数奶农直接将牛奶卖给消费者。肉鸡和养猪户主要卖给贸易商,但在动物补栏或产品分销方面依赖少数几家大型主导公司。直接卖给零售商或消费者(包括自家消费),并进行后院屠宰,是小规模养猪户、养羊户、养禽户的重要销售渠道。已确定的重要疾病风险行为与食用病死动物有关,反刍动物产品有地下经纪人网络在运作。合格的经过培训的健康管理人员主要被奶农、大型商业家禽养殖户和养猪户使用,而在小规模养殖中,使用不合格的健康管理人员或不进行治疗的情况很常见。据报告,由于城市家畜养殖户“感觉自己是不法之徒”、对政府“缺乏信任”、在非正式定居点“难以接触到”、“缺乏政府资金”或“人员不足”,对他们进行管控很困难。研究结果有助于制定政策,以帮助控制城市家畜养殖并将其相关的健康和环境风险降至最低。