• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当血糖变异性未得到改善时,1型和2型糖尿病患者以高血糖增加为代价,降低了低血糖的发生。

Individuals with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Trade Increased Hyperglycemia for Decreased Hypoglycemia When Glycemic Variability is not Improved.

作者信息

Jangam Sujit R, Hayter Gary, Dunn Timothy C

机构信息

Research and Development, Abbott Diabetes Care Inc., Alameda, CA, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Ther. 2018 Feb;9(1):395-402. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0340-x. Epub 2017 Nov 21.

DOI:10.1007/s13300-017-0340-x
PMID:29164512
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5801226/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Glycemic variability refers to oscillations in blood glucose within a day and differences in blood glucose at the same time on different days. Glycemic variability is linked to hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. The relationship among these three important metrics is examined here, specifically to show how reduction in both hypo- and hyperglycemia risk is dependent on changes in variability.

METHODS

To understand the importance of glycemic variability in the simultaneous reduction of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia risk, we introduce the glycemic risk plot-estimated HbA1c % (eA1c) vs. minutes below 70 mg/dl (MB70) with constant variability contours for predicting post-intervention risks in the absence of a change in glycemic variability.

RESULTS

The glycemic risk plot illustrates that individuals who do not reduce glycemic variability improve one of the two metrics (hypoglycemia risk or hyperglycemia risk) at the cost of the other. It is important to reduce variability to improve both risks. These results were confirmed by data collected in a randomized controlled trial consisting of individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy. For type 1, a total of 28 individuals out of 35 (80%) showed improvement in at least one of the risks (hypo and/or hyper) during the 100-day course of the study. Seven individuals (20%) showed improvement in both. Similar data were observed for type 2 where a total of 36 individuals out of 43 (84%) showed improvement in at least one risk and 8 individuals (19%) showed improvement in both. All individuals in the study who showed improvement in both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia risk also showed a reduction in variability.

CONCLUSION

Therapy changes intended to improve an individual's hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia risk often result in the reduction of one risk at the expense of another. It is important to improve glucose variability to reduce both risks or at least maintain one risk while reducing the other.

FUNDING

Abbott Diabetes Care.

摘要

引言

血糖变异性是指一天内血糖的波动以及不同日子同一时间血糖的差异。血糖变异性与低血糖和高血糖相关。本文研究这三个重要指标之间的关系,具体展示低血糖和高血糖风险的降低如何依赖于变异性的变化。

方法

为了解血糖变异性在同时降低低血糖和高血糖风险中的重要性,我们引入血糖风险图——估计糖化血红蛋白百分比(eA1c)与低于70mg/dl的分钟数(MB70),并绘制恒定变异性等高线,以预测在血糖变异性无变化的情况下干预后的风险。

结果

血糖风险图表明,不降低血糖变异性的个体改善了两个指标中的一个(低血糖风险或高血糖风险),但以牺牲另一个为代价。降低变异性对于同时改善两种风险很重要。这些结果在一项针对接受胰岛素治疗的1型和2型糖尿病患者的随机对照试验中收集的数据得到了证实。对于1型糖尿病患者,在为期100天的研究过程中,35名患者中有28名(80%)至少在一种风险(低血糖和/或高血糖)方面有所改善。7名患者(20%)在两种风险方面都有所改善。2型糖尿病患者也观察到类似的数据,43名患者中有36名(84%)至少在一种风险方面有所改善,8名患者(19%)在两种风险方面都有所改善。该研究中所有在低血糖和高血糖风险方面都有所改善的个体,其变异性也有所降低。

结论

旨在改善个体低血糖或高血糖风险的治疗改变通常会导致一种风险降低而以另一种风险为代价。改善血糖变异性以降低两种风险或至少在降低一种风险的同时维持另一种风险很重要。

资金来源

雅培糖尿病护理公司。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab8b/5801226/466cf70174e7/13300_2017_340_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab8b/5801226/05b051e1eedc/13300_2017_340_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab8b/5801226/3adae4a9ac0c/13300_2017_340_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab8b/5801226/1b38739faf0a/13300_2017_340_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab8b/5801226/466cf70174e7/13300_2017_340_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab8b/5801226/05b051e1eedc/13300_2017_340_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab8b/5801226/3adae4a9ac0c/13300_2017_340_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab8b/5801226/1b38739faf0a/13300_2017_340_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab8b/5801226/466cf70174e7/13300_2017_340_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Individuals with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Trade Increased Hyperglycemia for Decreased Hypoglycemia When Glycemic Variability is not Improved.当血糖变异性未得到改善时,1型和2型糖尿病患者以高血糖增加为代价,降低了低血糖的发生。
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Feb;9(1):395-402. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0340-x. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
2
[The optimal blood glucose target in critically ill patient: comparison of two intensive insulin therapy protocols].[重症患者的最佳血糖目标:两种强化胰岛素治疗方案的比较]
Med Clin (Barc). 2014 Mar 4;142(5):192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2012.11.032. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
3
Flash glucose monitoring reduces glycemic variability and hypoglycemia: real-world data from Spain.实时血糖监测可降低血糖变异性和低血糖风险:来自西班牙的真实世界数据。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Mar;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001052.
4
Metrics to Evaluate Quality of Glycemic Control: Comparison of Time in Target, Hypoglycemic, and Hyperglycemic Ranges with "Risk Indices".评估血糖控制质量的指标:目标范围内时间、低血糖和高血糖范围与“风险指数”的比较。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 May;20(5):325-334. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0416.
5
Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Recent Studies Demonstrating Improved Glycemic Outcomes.持续血糖监测:近期研究综述显示血糖结果得到改善
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Jun;19(S3):S25-S37. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0035.
6
EADSG Guidelines: Insulin Therapy in Diabetes.欧洲糖尿病研究学会指南:糖尿病的胰岛素治疗
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Apr;9(2):449-492. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0384-6. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
7
Vascular Glucose Sensor Symposium: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems (CGMS) for Hospitalized and Ambulatory Patients at Risk for Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, and Glycemic Variability.血管葡萄糖传感器研讨会:针对有高血糖、低血糖和血糖波动风险的住院及门诊患者的连续血糖监测系统(CGMS)
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jul;9(4):725-38. doi: 10.1177/1932296815587938. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
8
Glycemic control during consecutive days with prolonged walking exercise in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus.1型糖尿病患者连续多日进行长时间步行运动期间的血糖控制
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Jul;117:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.04.053. Epub 2016 May 6.
9
Evaluation of a new measure of blood glucose variability in diabetes.糖尿病患者血糖变异性新测量方法的评估
Diabetes Care. 2006 Nov;29(11):2433-8. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1085.
10
Glycemic variability during algorithmic titration of insulin among hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure.2型糖尿病合并心力衰竭住院患者胰岛素算法滴定期间的血糖变异性
J Diabetes Complications. 2016 Jan-Feb;30(1):150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomized Study Comparing Vildagliptin vs Glibenclamide on Glucose Variability and Endothelial Function in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension.一项关于维格列汀与格列本脲对2型糖尿病合并高血压患者血糖变异性和内皮功能影响的随机对照研究。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 Sep 15;13:3221-3229. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S257096. eCollection 2020.
2
Glycemic Monitoring and Management in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.血糖监测与管理在慢性肾脏病晚期中的应用。
Endocr Rev. 2020 Oct 1;41(5):756-74. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnaa017.
3
Evaluating a Glucose-Sensor-Based Tool to Help Clinicians and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Improve Self-Management Skills.

本文引用的文献

1
Toward Defining the Threshold Between Low and High Glucose Variability in Diabetes.探讨糖尿病患者血糖变异性的低限与高限界定值。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jul;40(7):832-838. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1769. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
2
Sensor and software use for the glycaemic management of insulin-treated type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients.传感器及软件在接受胰岛素治疗的1型和2型糖尿病患者血糖管理中的应用
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2016 May;13(3):211-9. doi: 10.1177/1479164115624680. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
3
Evaluating quality of glycemic control: graphical displays of hypo- and hyperglycemia, time in target range, and mean glucose.
评估一种基于葡萄糖传感器的工具,以帮助临床医生和1型糖尿病成年人提高自我管理技能。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Nov;12(6):1143-1151. doi: 10.1177/1932296818791534. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
评估血糖控制质量:低血糖和高血糖的图形展示、目标范围内时间以及平均血糖水平。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jan;9(1):56-62. doi: 10.1177/1932296814551046. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
4
Development of the Likelihood of Low Glucose (LLG) algorithm for evaluating risk of hypoglycemia: a new approach for using continuous glucose data to guide therapeutic decision making.用于评估低血糖风险的低血糖可能性(LLG)算法的开发:一种利用连续血糖数据指导治疗决策的新方法。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jul;8(4):720-30. doi: 10.1177/1932296814532200. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
5
Hypo- and hyperglycemia in relation to the mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and nature of the glucose distribution.低血糖和高血糖与血糖分布的均值、标准差、变异系数和性质有关。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Oct;14(10):868-76. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0062. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
6
New and improved methods to characterize glycemic variability using continuous glucose monitoring.使用连续血糖监测来表征血糖变异性的新的和改进的方法。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Sep;11(9):551-65. doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0015.
7
Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes.1型糖尿病的持续血糖监测与强化治疗
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 2;359(14):1464-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805017. Epub 2008 Sep 8.
8
Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values.将糖化血红蛋白检测结果转化为估计的平均血糖值。
Diabetes Care. 2008 Aug;31(8):1473-8. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0545. Epub 2008 Jun 7.
9
The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.糖尿病强化治疗对胰岛素依赖型糖尿病长期并发症发生及进展的影响。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):977-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401.