• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[在药物自主管理实验中精神卫生服务使用者的叙述]

[Narratives of users of mental health services in an experiment with autonomous management of medication].

作者信息

Gonçalves Laura Lamas Martins, Campos Rosana Teresa Onocko

机构信息

Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, Brasil.

Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brasil.

出版信息

Cad Saude Publica. 2017 Nov 21;33(11):e00166216. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00166216.

DOI:10.1590/0102-311X00166216
PMID:29166486
Abstract

Numerous studies have highlighted the tendency to chronicity of treatments centered on the use of medications. This study was conducted in a large Brazilian city with users of Centers for Psychosocial Care (CAPS), with the aim of evaluating the effects of experimenting with the personal Guide for Autonomous Management of Medication (GAM) and the users' relationship to their treatments and participation. The instrument, created in Canada and translated and adapted to Brazil, was tested in intervention groups with users of CAPS with severe mental disorders and a history of political participation in the field of health. Focus groups and in-depth interviews were performed. The transcriptions were transformed into narratives, and four analytical categories were defined: subjects with radical experiences of suffering; experiences with medication; users' rights; and participation and political activism. In testing GAM, users expressed a tension between reproduction of illness-centered identity and the legitimate uniqueness of their personal experiences. They showed greater knowledge of the medications they were taking, began to recognize their own expertise in their use of medications, and some sought adjustments to their treatment. They reported the need for support in claiming their rights and strengthening their participation as mental health activists. In conclusion, the Brazilian version of the GAM guide has the potential to contribute to users' empowerment, thus allowing dialogue between the results in mental health care in Brazil and the international scenario.

摘要

众多研究都强调了以药物使用为中心的治疗存在慢性化倾向。本研究在巴西一个大城市对心理社会关怀中心(CAPS)的使用者开展,旨在评估试用《药物自主管理个人指南》(GAM)的效果以及使用者与治疗的关系和参与情况。该指南在加拿大创建,后被翻译并改编用于巴西,在患有严重精神障碍且有卫生领域政治参与历史的CAPS使用者干预组中进行了测试。开展了焦点小组讨论和深度访谈。转录内容被转化为叙述内容,并定义了四个分析类别:有极端痛苦经历的主体;用药经历;使用者权利;以及参与和政治行动主义。在测试GAM时,使用者在以疾病为中心的身份认同的重现与其个人经历的合法独特性之间表现出一种紧张关系。他们对所服用药物有了更多了解,开始认识到自己在用药方面的专业知识,一些人还寻求调整治疗方案。他们报告称在主张权利和加强作为心理健康活动家的参与方面需要支持。总之,巴西版的GAM指南有潜力促进使用者赋权,从而使巴西心理健康护理的结果与国际情况之间能够展开对话。

相似文献

1
[Narratives of users of mental health services in an experiment with autonomous management of medication].[在药物自主管理实验中精神卫生服务使用者的叙述]
Cad Saude Publica. 2017 Nov 21;33(11):e00166216. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00166216.
2
[Autonomous Medication Management: an analytical intervention in mental health care services].[自主药物管理:精神卫生保健服务中的一种分析性干预措施]
Cien Saude Colet. 2013 Oct;18(10):2889-98. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232013001000013.
3
[The Citizen Committee as a co-management strategy in participatory research in the field of mental health in Quebec].[公民委员会作为魁北克心理健康领域参与式研究中的一种共同管理策略]
Cien Saude Colet. 2013 Oct;18(10):2919-28. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232013001000016.
4
Service users' experiences of participation in decision making in mental health services.服务使用者参与精神卫生服务决策的体验。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Nov;22(9):688-97. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12246. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
5
Gaining Autonomy & [corrected] Medication Management (GAM): new perspectives on well-being, quality of life and psychiatric medication.获得自主权与[修正后]药物管理(GAM):关于幸福感、生活质量和精神科药物的新视角。
Cien Saude Colet. 2013 Oct;18(10):2879-87. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232013001000012.
6
[The use of interviews in participative intervention and research: the GAM tool as a collective interview].
Cien Saude Colet. 2013 Oct;18(10):2813-24. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232013001000006.
7
Discontinuing Psychiatric Medications: A Survey of Long-Term Users.停止使用精神科药物:长期使用者的调查。
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Dec 1;68(12):1232-1238. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700070. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
8
Brazilian Mental Health Services Assessment: user satisfaction and associated factors.巴西心理健康服务评估:用户满意度及相关因素
Cien Saude Colet. 2018 Nov;23(11):3799-3810. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320182311.25722016.
9
Shifting Practices Toward Recovery-Oriented Care Through an E-Recovery Portal in Community Mental Health Care: A Mixed-Methods Exploratory Study.通过社区精神卫生保健中的电子康复门户将实践转向以康复为导向的护理:一项混合方法探索性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 2;19(5):e145. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7524.
10
[Evaluation of a citizenship-oriented intervention: The Citizens' Project of the University of Recovery].[一项以公民身份为导向的干预措施评估:康复大学公民项目]
Sante Ment Que. 2017 Spring;42(1):205-222.

引用本文的文献

1
State of the Art of Participatory and User-led Research in Mental Health in Brazil: A Scoping Review.巴西心理健康领域参与式和用户主导研究的现状:一项范围综述
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2023 Apr 5;10. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2023.12. eCollection 2023.
2
Therapeutic Adherence of People with Mental Disorders: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis.精神障碍患者的治疗依从性:一个进化的概念分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 22;20(5):3869. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053869.