Glendinning Laura, McLachlan Gerry, Vervelde Lonneke
Developmental Biology, The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Infection and Immunity, The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 22;12(11):e0188455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188455. eCollection 2017.
In this era of next generation sequencing technologies it is now possible to characterise the chicken respiratory microbiota without the biases inherent to traditional culturing techniques. However, little research has been performed in this area. In this study we characterise and compare buccal, nasal and lung microbiota samples from chickens in three different age groups using 16S rRNA gene analysis. Buccal and nasal swabs were taken from birds aged 2 days (n = 5), 3 weeks (n = 5) and 30 months (n = 6). Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples were also collected alongside reagent only controls. DNA was extracted from these samples and the V2-V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced. Quality control and OTU clustering were performed in mothur. Bacterial DNA was quantified using qPCR, amplifying the V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene. We found significant differences between the quantity and types of bacteria sampled at the three different respiratory sites. We also found significant differences in the composition, richness and diversity of the bacterial communities in buccal, nasal and BAL fluid samples between age groups. We identified several bacteria which had previously been isolated from the chicken respiratory tract in culture based studies, including lactobacilli and staphylococci. However, we also identified bacteria which have not previously been cultured from the respiratory tract of the healthy chicken. We conclude that our study can be used as a baseline that future chicken respiratory microbiota studies can build upon.
在这个新一代测序技术的时代,现在有可能对鸡的呼吸道微生物群进行表征,而不会受到传统培养技术固有的偏差影响。然而,在这个领域进行的研究很少。在本研究中,我们使用16S rRNA基因分析对三个不同年龄组的鸡的口腔、鼻腔和肺部微生物群样本进行表征和比较。从2日龄(n = 5)、3周龄(n = 5)和30月龄(n = 6)的鸡身上采集口腔和鼻腔拭子。同时还收集了支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)样本以及仅含试剂的对照样本。从这些样本中提取DNA,并对16S rRNA基因的V2-V3区域进行扩增和测序。在mothur中进行质量控制和OTU聚类。使用qPCR对细菌DNA进行定量,扩增16S rRNA基因的V3区域。我们发现在三个不同呼吸道部位采样的细菌数量和类型之间存在显著差异。我们还发现不同年龄组的口腔、鼻腔和BAL液样本中细菌群落的组成、丰富度和多样性存在显著差异。我们鉴定出了几种在基于培养的研究中先前已从鸡呼吸道分离出的细菌,包括乳酸杆菌和葡萄球菌。然而,我们也鉴定出了先前未从健康鸡的呼吸道培养出的细菌。我们得出结论,我们的研究可以作为未来鸡呼吸道微生物群研究的基础。