Research Center of Applied and Preventive Cardiovascular Medicine (J.K., O.T.R., C.G.M.)
Heart Center (J.K.).
Circulation. 2018 Mar 20;137(12):1246-1255. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029726. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
Data suggest that the prediction of adult cardiovascular disease using a model comprised entirely of adult nonlaboratory-based risk factors is equivalent to an approach that additionally incorporates adult lipid measures. We assessed and compared the utility of a risk model based solely on nonlaboratory risk factors in adolescence versus a lipid model based on nonlaboratory risk factors plus lipids for predicting high-risk carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) in adulthood.
The study comprised 2893 participants 12 to 18 years of age from 4 longitudinal cohort studies from the United States (Bogalusa Heart Study and the Insulin Study), Australia (Childhood Determinants of Adult Health Study), and Finland (The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study) and followed into adulthood when cIMT was measured (mean follow-up, 23.4 years). Overweight status was defined according to the Cole classification. Hypertension was defined according to the Fourth Report on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. High-risk plasma lipid levels were defined according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Cholesterol Levels in Children. High cIMT was defined as a study-specific value ≥90th percentile. Age and sex were included in each model.
In univariate models, all risk factors except for borderline high and high triglycerides in adolescence were associated with high cIMT in adulthood. In multivariable models (relative risk [95% confidence interval]), male sex (2.7 [2.0-2.6]), prehypertension (1.4 [1.0-1.9]), hypertension (1.9 [1.3-2.9]), overweight (2.0 [1.4-2.9]), obesity (3.7 [2.0-7.0]), borderline high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (1.6 [1.2-2.2]), high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (1.6 [1.1-2.1]), and borderline low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (1.4 [1.0-1.8]) remained significant predictors of high cIMT (<0.05). The addition of lipids into the nonlaboratory risk model slightly but significantly improved discrimination in predicting high cIMT compared with nonlaboratory-based risk factors only (C statistics for laboratory-based model 0.717 [95% confidence interval, 0.685-0.748] and for nonlaboratory 0.698 [95% confidence interval, 0.667-0.731]; =0.02).
Nonlaboratory-based risk factors and lipids measured in adolescence independently predicted preclinical atherosclerosis in young adulthood. The addition of lipid measurements to traditional clinic-based risk factor assessment provided a statistically significant but clinically modest improvement on adolescent prediction of high cIMT in adulthood.
有数据表明,使用完全由成人非实验室基础风险因素组成的模型来预测成人心血管疾病,与另外纳入成人血脂指标的方法相当。我们评估和比较了仅基于青少年非实验室风险因素的风险模型与基于非实验室风险因素加血脂的血脂模型在预测成年后高风险颈动脉内膜中层厚度(cIMT)方面的效用。
该研究纳入了来自美国(博加卢萨心脏研究和胰岛素研究)、澳大利亚(儿童期决定成人健康研究)和芬兰(芬兰年轻人心血管风险研究)的 4 项纵向队列研究的 2893 名 12 至 18 岁的参与者,在成年时测量 cIMT(平均随访时间 23.4 年)。超重状态根据 Cole 分类定义。高血压根据国家高血压教育计划第四次儿童和青少年高血压报告定义。高危血浆脂质水平根据国家胆固醇教育计划儿童胆固醇水平专家组定义。高 cIMT 定义为研究特定值≥第 90 百分位。每个模型均包含年龄和性别。
在单变量模型中,除青春期边缘性高和高甘油三酯外,所有风险因素均与成年后高 cIMT 相关。在多变量模型中(相对风险[95%置信区间]),男性(2.7[2.0-2.6])、前高血压(1.4[1.0-1.9])、高血压(1.9[1.3-2.9])、超重(2.0[1.4-2.9])、肥胖(3.7[2.0-7.0])、边缘性低 LDL 胆固醇升高(1.6[1.2-2.2])、LDL 胆固醇升高(1.6[1.1-2.1])和边缘性低 HDL 胆固醇升高(1.4[1.0-1.8])仍然是高 cIMT 的显著预测因素(<0.05)。与仅基于非实验室风险因素的模型相比,将脂质纳入非实验室风险模型可略微但显著改善预测高 cIMT 的能力(基于实验室模型的 C 统计量为 0.717[95%置信区间,0.685-0.748],基于非实验室的为 0.698[95%置信区间,0.667-0.731];=0.02)。
青春期的非实验室风险因素和脂质独立预测了青年成年人的亚临床动脉粥样硬化。将脂质测量纳入传统的基于诊所的风险因素评估,在预测成年后高 cIMT 方面,与传统的基于诊所的风险因素评估相比,统计学上有显著但临床意义上适度的改善。