Blau G
Blutalkohol. 1989 Jan;26(1):1-6.
In a review the author agrees with the German Federal Court's judgement of 9.8.88 (see Blutalkohol 25,403). He deals with the relation between physiological and psychological circumstantial evidences (blood-alcohol-concentration and condition of personality in the time of violation) and with their reference to the ascertainment of reduced responsibility. In accordance with the Federal Court he states that within the necessary total assessment the importance of blood-alcohol-concentration is the lower the more the BAC-level figured out is remote from the probable BAC in the time of violation because of the long period of time between. He concludes that the Federal Court was successful in it's attempt to draw the juridical arguments near to those of forensic medicine.
在一篇综述中,作者认同德国联邦法院1988年8月9日的判决(见《血液酒精含量》第25卷,第403页)。他探讨了生理和心理方面的间接证据(血液酒精浓度与违规时的人格状况)之间的关系,以及它们与认定减轻责任的关联。他指出,依据联邦法院的观点,在必要的综合评估中,由于违规时间与所测血液酒精浓度之间间隔时间过长,所测血液酒精浓度与违规时可能的血液酒精浓度相差越大,血液酒精浓度的重要性就越低。他得出结论,联邦法院在使法律论据贴近法医学论据的尝试中取得了成功。