Tibana Ramires A, Franco Octávio L, Cunha Gabriel V, Sousa Nuno M F, Sousa Neto Ivo V, Carvalho Márcia M, Almeida Jesser A, Durigan João L Q, Marqueti Rita C, Navalta James W, Lobo Mariana O, Voltarelli Fabricio A, Prestes Jonato
Graduation Program on Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia, Brasilia, BRAZIL.
Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition Sciences, University of Nevada, Nevada, Las Vegas, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2017 Nov 1;10(7):1051-1066. doi: 10.70252/QXSN7331. eCollection 2017.
Studies are conflicting to whether low volume resistance training (RT) is as effective as high-volume RT protocols with respect to promoting morphological and molecular adaptations. Thus, the aim of the present study was to compare, using a climbing a vertical ladder, the effects of 8 weeks, 3 times per week, resistance training with 4 sets (RT4), resistance training with 8 sets (RT8) and without resistance training control (CON) on gastrocnemius muscle proteome using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and cross sectional area (CSA) of rats. Fifty-two proteins were identified by LC-MS/MS, with 39 in common between the three groups, two in common between RT8 and CON, one in common between RT8 and RT4, four exclusive in the CON, one in the RT8, and four in the RT4. The RT8 group had a reduced abundance of 12 proteins, mostly involved in muscle protein synthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, tricarboxylic acid cycle, anti-oxidant defense, and oxygen transport. Otherwise one protein involved with energy transduction as compared with CON group showed high abundance. There was no qualitative protein abundance difference between RT4 and CON groups. These results revealed that high volume RT induced undesirable disturbances on skeletal muscle proteins, while lower volume RT resulted in similar gains in skeletal muscle hypertrophy without impairment of proteome. The CSA was significantly higher in RT8 group when compared to RT4 group, which was significantly higher than CON group. However, no differences were found between trained groups when the gastrocnemius CSA were normalized by the total body weight.
关于低容量抗阻训练(RT)在促进形态和分子适应性方面是否与高容量RT方案一样有效,研究结果存在冲突。因此,本研究的目的是使用攀爬垂直梯子的方式,比较每周3次、为期8周的4组抗阻训练(RT4)、8组抗阻训练(RT8)以及无抗阻训练对照组(CON)对大鼠腓肠肌蛋白质组和横截面积(CSA)的影响,采用液相色谱质谱联用(LC-MS/MS)技术进行分析。通过LC-MS/MS鉴定出52种蛋白质,三组之间共有39种,RT8和CON之间有2种相同,RT8和RT4之间有1种相同,CON组有4种独特的,RT8组有1种,RT4组有4种。RT8组中有12种蛋白质丰度降低,这些蛋白质大多参与肌肉蛋白质合成、碳水化合物代谢、三羧酸循环、抗氧化防御和氧气运输。此外,与CON组相比,一种参与能量转导的蛋白质显示出高丰度。RT4组和CON组之间在蛋白质丰度上没有定性差异。这些结果表明,高容量RT会对骨骼肌蛋白质产生不良干扰,而低容量RT在不损害蛋白质组的情况下,能使骨骼肌肥大获得相似的增加。与RT4组相比,RT8组的CSA显著更高,RT4组又显著高于CON组。然而,当将腓肠肌CSA按体重归一化后,训练组之间未发现差异。