• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们能否继续有效地打击数字犯罪?

Can we continue to effectively police digital crime?

作者信息

Horsman Graeme

机构信息

Department of Computing, Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Computer Science, The David Goldman Informatics Centre, St Peter's Way, Sunderland SR6 0DD, UK.

出版信息

Sci Justice. 2017 Nov;57(6):448-454. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.scijus.2017.06.001
PMID:29173458
Abstract

Now approximately 30years old, the field of digital forensics is arguably facing some of its greatest challenges to date. Whilst currently supporting law enforcement in numerous criminal cases annually, questions are beginning to emerge regarding whether it can sustain this contribution, with digital crime remaining prevalent. In his first live interview in September 2015, Head of MI5, Andrew Parker indicated that individuals are now engaging in computing acts which are beyond the control of authorities, confirming earlier remarks made by British Prime Minister David Cameron in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo attacks. Such comments cast doubt on the future effectiveness of the digital forensic discipline and its ability to effectively investigate those who implement the latest forms of technology to carry out illicit acts. This article debates the controversial question, could we be facing an era where digital crime can no longer be effectively policed?

摘要

如今,数字取证领域大约已有30年历史,可谓正面临着迄今为止一些最为严峻的挑战。虽然目前每年在众多刑事案件中为执法部门提供支持,但随着数字犯罪依然猖獗,对于该领域能否持续做出这种贡献,质疑声开始出现。在2015年9月的首次现场采访中,军情五处负责人安德鲁·帕克表示,如今个人的计算机行为已超出当局控制范围,证实了英国首相戴维·卡梅伦在《查理周刊》袭击事件后早些时候发表的言论。此类言论令人对数字取证学科未来的有效性及其有效调查那些利用最新技术形式实施非法行为者的能力产生怀疑。本文探讨了这个有争议的问题:我们是否可能正面临一个数字犯罪无法再得到有效监管的时代?

相似文献

1
Can we continue to effectively police digital crime?我们能否继续有效地打击数字犯罪?
Sci Justice. 2017 Nov;57(6):448-454. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
2
The invisible evidence: Digital forensics as key to solving crimes in the digital age.无形的证据:数字取证是解决数字时代犯罪的关键。
Forensic Sci Int. 2024 Sep;362:112133. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112133. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
3
Fighting trafficking of falsified and substandard medicinal products in Russia.打击俄罗斯假药和劣药的非法交易。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S37-40. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150681.
4
Digital forensics: an analytical crime scene procedure model (ACSPM).数字取证:一种分析性犯罪现场程序模型 (ACSPM)。
Forensic Sci Int. 2013 Dec 10;233(1-3):244-56. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
5
When finding nothing may be evidence of something: Anti-forensics and digital tool marks.当一无所获可能成为某种证据时:反取证与数字工具痕迹
Sci Justice. 2019 Sep;59(5):565-572. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
6
Cooperation between law enforcement officers and forensic specialists. Diagnosis and possible improvements - a Lithuanian experience.执法人员与法医专家之间的合作。诊断与可能的改进——立陶宛的经验。
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2016;66(3):182-210. doi: 10.5114/amsik.2016.66402.
7
Crime displacement in digital drug markets.数字毒品市场中的犯罪转移。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Jan;63:113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
8
Inter-regional digital forensic knowledge management: needs, challenges, and solutions.区域间数字取证知识管理:需求、挑战与解决方案。
J Forensic Sci. 2021 Mar;66(2):619-629. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14613. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
9
Intelligence-led crime scene processing. Part I: Forensic intelligence.情报主导型犯罪现场处理。第一部分:法庭科学情报。
Forensic Sci Int. 2010 Feb 25;195(1-3):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.10.027. Epub 2009 Nov 22.
10
D4I - Digital forensics framework for reviewing and investigating cyber attacks.D4I - 用于审查和调查网络攻击的数字取证框架。
Array (N Y). 2020;5. doi: 10.1016/j.array.2019.100015.