Department of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Affiliated Hospital to Academy of Military Medical Sciences, 307 Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100071, PR China.
Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Affiliated Hospital to Academy of Military Medical Sciences, 307 Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100071, PR China.
Blood Rev. 2018 May;32(3):192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
Acute leukemia is a global disease with a poor prognosis for many patients. While an increasing number of patients with acute leukemia are being treated with unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) or umbilical cord blood transplants (UCBT), recent comparative reports of these 2 procedures are lacking. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of unrelated HSCT and unrelated single-unit UCBT for the treatment of pediatric and adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The primary outcomes were the rates of relapse, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and days to neutrophil and platelet recovery. Pooled effects (odds ratios [OR] or difference in means) were determined with either random- or fixed-effects models. Our meta-analysis included 9 studies that enrolled 6762 patients (UCBT: n=2026; HSCT: n=4736). The risk of relapse for patients undergoing UCBT was similar to that of patients who received an HSCT (OR=1.030; 95%CI, 0.767 to 1.383, P=0.847). We also found no difference between HSCT and UCBT for OS (pooled OR=1.417; 95%CI, 0.936 to 2.146; P=0.100) or PFS (OR=1.165; 95%CI, 0.996 to 1.362; P=0.056). However, neutrophil and platelet recovery periods were both shorter after HSCT than after UCBT (neutrophil recovery: difference in means=-3.420, 95% CI: -5.491 to -1.349, P=0.001; platelet recovery: difference in means -20.350, 95% CI: -33.656 to -7.044, P=0.003). Collectively, our data provide strong evidence to support increased use of cord blood transplants for both adults and children with acute leukemia.
急性白血病是一种全球性疾病,许多患者预后较差。虽然越来越多的急性白血病患者接受了无关造血干细胞移植(HSCT)或脐带血移植(UCBT)治疗,但最近缺乏这两种方法的比较报告。因此,我们对无关 HSCT 和无关单份 UCBT 治疗儿童和成人急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)或急性髓系白血病(AML)的安全性和有效性进行了荟萃分析。主要结局是复发率、总生存率(OS)、无进展生存率(PFS)以及中性粒细胞和血小板恢复的时间。采用随机或固定效应模型确定汇总效果(优势比[OR]或均值差异)。我们的荟萃分析纳入了 9 项研究,共纳入 6762 例患者(UCBT:n=2026;HSCT:n=4736)。接受 UCBT 的患者复发风险与接受 HSCT 的患者相似(OR=1.030;95%CI,0.767 至 1.383,P=0.847)。我们还发现 HSCT 和 UCBT 之间在 OS(汇总 OR=1.417;95%CI,0.936 至 2.146;P=0.100)或 PFS(OR=1.165;95%CI,0.996 至 1.362;P=0.056)方面无差异。然而,HSCT 后中性粒细胞和血小板恢复时间均短于 UCBT(中性粒细胞恢复:均值差-3.420,95%CI:-5.491 至-1.349,P=0.001;血小板恢复:均值差-20.350,95%CI:-33.656 至-7.044,P=0.003)。总的来说,我们的数据提供了强有力的证据,支持增加使用脐带血移植治疗成人和儿童急性白血病。