Department of Cardiology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC; Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
Cardiology Division, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Mar;93(3):333-336. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
An inverse association between physical activity or fitness status and health outcomes has been reported by several cohort studies. When fitness categories are established in quartiles or quintiles based on the peak exercise capacity achieved, the association is graded. Although significant health benefits of increased cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) have been uniformly reported, the degree of protection has varied substantially between studies. This variability is likely due to varying methods used to define CRF categories, and not considering age, despite its strong effect on CRF. To ameliorate these methodological discrepancies, we propose standardized guidelines by which age-specific CRF categories should be defined.
几项队列研究报告称,身体活动或健康状况与健康结果呈负相关。当根据达到的最大运动能力将健康状况分类为四等份或五等份时,这种关联是分级的。尽管普遍报道了增加心肺健康(CRF)的显著健康益处,但不同研究之间的保护程度有很大差异。这种可变性可能是由于定义 CRF 类别的方法不同,并且没有考虑年龄,尽管年龄对 CRF 有很强的影响。为了改善这些方法学差异,我们提出了标准化指南,规定了应根据年龄定义特定的 CRF 类别。