Klemm Katja, Krell-Roesch Janina, De Clerck Ine Lucia, Brehm Walter, Boes Klaus
Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Department of Health and Care, Artevelde University of Applied Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.
Front Physiol. 2021 Jan 8;11:615237. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.615237. eCollection 2020.
There are conflicting reports about the fitness status of European adults, partly due to the lack of a standardized fitness test battery used across Europe. The European Fitness Badge (EFB) was developed in 2017 as an online-based tool to assess the health-related fitness of persons aged ≥ 18 years residing in European countries. We examined the demographic characteristics and fitness status of persons who completed the EFB between June 2017 and May 2019.
We conducted a multinational study in eight European countries. Participants completed the EFB which includes 11 validated motor tests to measure endurance, strength, coordination, and flexibility performance, under the supervision of an EFB instructor in different settings (e.g., sports club sessions, public events). Two different test batteries [test profiles (TPs)] are available to distinguish between less active (TP1) and active individuals (TP2). We calculated descriptive statistics and conducted analyses of variance to examine sample characteristics and a potential impact of sex, age, body mass index (BMI), physical activity, and posture on fitness as assessed by the EFB.
The sample included 6,019 adults (68.7% females; mean age 52.7 years; age range 18-89 years). Participants who completed TP1 were older (TP1: 61.4 years; TP2: 44.2 years; = 0.00), reported a lower level of physical activity (TP1: 3.8; TP2: 4.0; = 0.00), had a higher BMI (TP1: 25.7; TP2: 24.3; = 0.00) and a higher frequency of postural abnormalities (TP1: 43%; TP2: 33%; = 0.00) than TP2 participants. Among 3,034 participants who completed TP2, males had higher performance in endurance, strength, and overall fitness, whereas females performed better in coordination and flexibility tests. In addition, younger age, lower BMI, and higher level of physical activity engagement were associated with better EFB test performance.
The EFB can be used to assess the health-related fitness status of individuals aged ≥ 18 years. Our results show that TP1 and TP2 were completed by persons from the respective target groups (i.e., less active vs. active), and also confirm findings from previous studies on potential determinants of fitness such as sex or age.
关于欧洲成年人健康状况的报告相互矛盾,部分原因是欧洲缺乏统一使用的标准化健康测试组合。欧洲健康徽章(EFB)于2017年开发,是一种基于网络的工具,用于评估居住在欧洲国家的18岁及以上人群与健康相关的健康状况。我们研究了2017年6月至2019年5月期间完成EFB的人群的人口统计学特征和健康状况。
我们在八个欧洲国家进行了一项跨国研究。参与者在不同环境(如体育俱乐部活动、公共活动)中的EFB指导员监督下完成了EFB,其中包括11项经过验证的运动测试,以测量耐力、力量、协调性和柔韧性表现。有两种不同的测试组合[测试简表(TPs)]可用于区分活动较少的个体(TP1)和活跃个体(TP2)。我们计算了描述性统计数据,并进行了方差分析,以检查样本特征以及性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、身体活动和姿势对EFB评估的健康状况的潜在影响。
样本包括6019名成年人(68.7%为女性;平均年龄52.7岁;年龄范围18 - 89岁)。完成TP1的参与者年龄更大(TP1:61.4岁;TP2:44.2岁;P = 0.00),报告的身体活动水平较低(TP1:3.8;TP2:4.0;P = 0.00),BMI较高(TP1:25.7;TP2:24.3;P = 0.00),姿势异常频率较高(TP1:43%;TP2:33%;P = 0.00)。在完成TP2的3034名参与者中,男性在耐力、力量和整体健康方面表现更好,而女性在协调性和柔韧性测试中表现更好。此外,年龄较小、BMI较低和身体活动参与水平较高与更好的EFB测试表现相关。
EFB可用于评估18岁及以上人群与健康相关的健康状况。我们的结果表明,TP1和TP2由各自目标群体(即活动较少者与活跃者)的人员完成,并且还证实了先前关于健康潜在决定因素(如性别或年龄)的研究结果。