Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208-3550, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Curr Biol. 2017 Dec 4;27(23):3699-3705.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.032. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
Some forms of associative learning require only a single experience to create a lasting memory [1, 2]. In contrast, perceptual learning often requires extensive practice within a day for performance to improve across days [3, 4]. This suggests that the requisite practice for durable perceptual learning is integrated throughout each day. If the total amount of daily practice is the only important variable, then a practice break within a day should not disrupt across-day improvement. To test this idea, we trained human listeners on an auditory frequency-discrimination task over multiple days and compared the performance of those who engaged in a single continuous practice session each day [4] with those who were given a 30-min break halfway through each practice session. Continuous practice yielded significant perceptual learning [4]. In contrast, practice with a rest break led to no improvement, indicating that the integration process had decayed within 30 min. In a separate experiment, a 30-min practice break also disrupted durable learning on a non-native phonetic classification task. These results suggest that practice trials are integrated up to a learning threshold within a transient memory store before they are sent en masse into a memory that lasts across days. Thus, the oft cited benefits of distributed over massed training [5, 6] may arise from different mechanisms depending on whether the breaks occur before or after a learning threshold has been reached. Trial integration could serve as an early gatekeeper to plasticity, helping to ensure that longer-lasting changes are only made when deemed worthwhile.
一些形式的联想学习只需要一次体验即可创建持久的记忆[1,2]。相比之下,知觉学习通常需要在一天内进行大量的练习,才能在多天内提高表现[3,4]。这表明,持久的知觉学习所需的练习是在每天都进行整合的。如果每天的总练习量是唯一重要的变量,那么在一天内进行练习中断不应破坏多天的改善。为了检验这一想法,我们在多日的听觉频率辨别任务中对人类听众进行了训练,并比较了那些每天进行一次连续练习的人的表现[4]与那些在每次练习的中途进行 30 分钟休息的人的表现。连续练习产生了显著的知觉学习[4]。相比之下,有休息时间的练习则没有提高,表明整合过程在 30 分钟内已经衰退。在另一个实验中,30 分钟的练习中断也破坏了非母语语音分类任务中的持久学习。这些结果表明,在记忆存储的短暂记忆中,练习试验在达到学习阈值之前就被整合在一起,然后一次性地被传递到持续多天的记忆中[4]。因此,分散训练的常被引用的好处[5,6]可能是由不同的机制引起的,具体取决于中断是在达到学习阈值之前还是之后发生。试验整合可以作为可塑性的早期把关者,有助于确保只有在被认为有价值时才进行更持久的变化。