Suppr超能文献

混合式学习课程和翻转课堂在第一年麻醉培训中的效果。

Effectiveness of a blended learning course and flipped classroom in first year anaesthesia training.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Rouen University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Rouen University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France.

出版信息

Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018 Oct;37(5):411-415. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blended learning, which combines internet-based platform and lecturing, is used in anaesthesiology and critical care teaching. However, the benefits of this method remain unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised work between 2007 and 2014 to study the effect of blended learning on the results of first year anaesthesia and critical care residents in comparison with traditional teaching. Blended learning was implemented in Rouen University Hospital in 2011 and residents affiliated to this university corresponded as the blended learning group. The primary outcome was the resident's results as measured with multiple-choice questions between blended learning and control groups after beginning blended learning (post-interventional stage). The secondary outcomes included residents' results between pre and post-interventional stages and homework's time. Moreover, comparison between control and blended learning group before beginning blended learning (pre-interventional stage) was performed.

RESULTS

From 2007 to 2014, 308 residents were included. For the pre-interventional period, the mean score in the blended learning group (n=53) was 176 (CI 95% 163 to 188) whereas the mean score in the control group (n=106) was 167 (CI 95% 160 to 174) (no difference). For the post-interventional period, the mean score in blended learning group (n=54) was 232 on 300 (CI95% 227-237) whereas the mean score in the control group (n=95) is 215 (CI95% 209-220) (P<0.001). In the two groups, comparison between pre and post-interventional stages showed the increase of mean score, stronger for blended learning group (32% and 28% in blended learning and control group, P<0.05). The average time of homework in the blended learning group was 27h (CI 95% 18.2-35.8) and 10h in the control group (CI 95% 2-18) (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This work suggests the positive effect of blended learning (associating internet-based learning and flipped classroom) on the anaesthesia and critical care residents' knowledge by increasing their homework's time.

摘要

背景

混合式学习将基于互联网的平台与授课相结合,应用于麻醉学和危重病医学教学中。然而,这种方法的益处尚不清楚。

方法

我们于 2007 年至 2014 年进行了一项前瞻性、多中心、非随机的研究,比较了混合式学习对第一年麻醉和危重病住院医师的结果与传统教学的影响。2011 年在鲁昂大学医院实施了混合式学习,隶属于该大学的住院医师作为混合式学习组。主要结局是在开始混合式学习后(干预后阶段),比较混合式学习组和对照组的住院医师通过多项选择题的成绩。次要结局包括干预前后阶段住院医师的成绩和家庭作业时间。此外,还在开始混合式学习前(干预前阶段)对对照组和混合式学习组进行了比较。

结果

2007 年至 2014 年期间,共纳入 308 名住院医师。在干预前阶段,混合式学习组(n=53)的平均得分为 176(95%CI 163-188),对照组(n=106)的平均得分为 167(95%CI 160-174)(无差异)。在干预后阶段,混合式学习组(n=54)的平均得分为 300 分中的 232 分(95%CI95% 227-237),对照组(n=95)的平均得分为 215 分(95%CI95% 209-220)(P<0.001)。在两组中,干预前后阶段的比较显示,平均得分均有所增加,混合式学习组的增幅更大(混合式学习组为 32%,对照组为 28%,P<0.05)。混合式学习组的家庭作业平均时间为 27 小时(95%CI 18.2-35.8),对照组为 10 小时(95%CI 2-18)(P<0.05)。

结论

这项工作表明,混合式学习(结合基于互联网的学习和翻转课堂)通过增加家庭作业时间,对麻醉和危重病住院医师的知识产生了积极影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验