Günay İsmailoğlu Elif, Zaybak Ayten
Author Affiliation: Ege University, zmir, Turkey.
Comput Inform Nurs. 2018 Feb;36(2):98-105. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000405.
The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a virtual intravenous simulator with a plastic arm model in teaching intravenous catheter insertion skills to nursing students. We used a randomized controlled quasi-experimental trial design and recruited 65 students who were assigned to the experimental (n = 33) and control (n = 32) groups using the simple random sampling method. The experimental group received intravenous catheterization skills training on the virtual intravenous simulator, and the control group received the same training on a plastic model of a human arm. Data were collected using the personal information form, intravenous catheterization knowledge assessment form, Intravenous Catheterization Skill Test, Self-Confidence and Satisfaction Scale, and Fear Symptoms Scale. In the study, the mean scores in the control group were 20.44 for psychomotor skills, 15.62 for clinical psychomotor skills, 31.78 for self-confidence, and 21.77 for satisfaction. The mean scores in the experimental group were 45.18 for psychomotor skills, 16.28 for clinical psychomotor skills, 34.18 for self-confidence, and 43.89 for satisfaction. The results indicated that psychomotor skills and satisfaction scores were higher in the experimental group, while the clinical psychomotor skills and self-confidence scores were similar in both groups. More students in the control group reported experiencing symptoms such as cold and sweaty hands, significant restlessness, and tense muscles than those in the experimental group.
本研究的目的是比较虚拟静脉模拟器与塑料手臂模型在向护理专业学生教授静脉导管插入技能方面的有效性。我们采用随机对照准实验设计,通过简单随机抽样方法招募了65名学生,并将其分为实验组(n = 33)和对照组(n = 32)。实验组在虚拟静脉模拟器上接受静脉导管插入技能培训,对照组在人体手臂塑料模型上接受相同培训。使用个人信息表、静脉导管插入知识评估表、静脉导管插入技能测试、自信与满意度量表以及恐惧症状量表收集数据。在研究中,对照组的心理运动技能平均得分为20.44,临床心理运动技能平均得分为15.62,自信平均得分为31.78,满意度平均得分为21.77。实验组的心理运动技能平均得分为45.18,临床心理运动技能平均得分为16.28,自信平均得分为34.18,满意度平均得分为43.89。结果表明,实验组的心理运动技能和满意度得分更高,而两组的临床心理运动技能和自信得分相似。与实验组相比,对照组中更多的学生报告出现了诸如手冷出汗、明显烦躁不安和肌肉紧张等症状。