• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高保真模拟与中保真模拟在护理学生决策中的比较研究:实验研究。

Comparative study between high-fidelity simulation and medium-fidelity simulation in decision-making of nursing students: experimental study.

机构信息

Instituto Politécnico de Leiria, Escola Superior de Saúde de Leiria, Leiria, LEI, Portugal.

Instituto Politécnico de Leiria, ciTechCare - Center for Innovative Care and Health Technology, Leiria, LEI, Portugal.

出版信息

Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2024 Aug 12;32:e4269. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.6847.4269. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1590/1518-8345.6847.4269
PMID:39140563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11321187/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to compare the decision-making of Nursing students, before and after theoretical training on basic life support, using the practice of high-fidelity simulation and medium-fidelity simulation.

METHOD

an experimental study was developed, pre- and post-test type, with quantitative, descriptive and inferential analysis, with theoretical training on basic life support and clinical simulation practices, and with evaluation of knowledge and decision-making of Nursing students, at three different moments - before the simulation scenario (T0), after the simulation scenario (T1) and after clinical teaching (T2).

RESULTS

51 students participated in the research, with an average age of 20.25±3.804, of which 92.2% were female. Statistically significant differences (F=6.47; p=0.039) were evident regarding the definition of the problem and development of objectives in decision-making in the experimental group.

CONCLUSION

Nursing students demonstrate an adequate level of knowledge and a good decision-making process, based on the most current instruments produced by scientific evidence, in clinical simulation scenarios in basic life support, and this innovative methodology should be deepened in the Nursing teaching.

HIGHLIGHTS

(1) Clinical simulation promotes good decision-making of Nursing students.(2) Students demonstrated adequate knowledge about basic life support.(3) Knowledge and practice define the fidelity of clinical simulation.(4) Basic life support can be developed by high-fidelity simulation.

摘要

目的

比较护理学生在接受基本生命支持理论培训前后,使用高保真模拟和中保真模拟进行决策的情况。

方法

这是一项实验研究,采用前后测试类型,进行定量、描述和推理分析,包括基本生命支持的理论培训和临床模拟实践,并评估护理学生在三个不同时刻的知识和决策能力——模拟场景前(T0)、模拟场景后(T1)和临床教学后(T2)。

结果

共有 51 名学生参与了研究,平均年龄为 20.25±3.804 岁,其中 92.2%为女性。实验组在问题定义和决策目标制定方面表现出统计学上显著的差异(F=6.47;p=0.039)。

结论

护理学生在基本生命支持的临床模拟场景中,基于最先进的科学证据产生的仪器,表现出足够的知识水平和良好的决策过程,这种创新方法应该在护理教学中得到深化。

重点

(1)临床模拟促进护理学生的良好决策。(2)学生对基本生命支持有足够的了解。(3)知识和实践定义临床模拟的逼真度。(4)基本生命支持可以通过高保真模拟来实现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ddb/11321187/855c0526e88a/1518-8345-rlae-32-e4269-gf6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ddb/11321187/6b74977378e1/1518-8345-rlae-32-e4269-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ddb/11321187/ebffd0d49304/1518-8345-rlae-32-e4269-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ddb/11321187/71be0b9b2c27/1518-8345-rlae-32-e4269-gf3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ddb/11321187/e758c2d44abb/1518-8345-rlae-32-e4269-gf4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ddb/11321187/c6e4518f2937/1518-8345-rlae-32-e4269-gf5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ddb/11321187/855c0526e88a/1518-8345-rlae-32-e4269-gf6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ddb/11321187/6b74977378e1/1518-8345-rlae-32-e4269-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ddb/11321187/ebffd0d49304/1518-8345-rlae-32-e4269-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ddb/11321187/71be0b9b2c27/1518-8345-rlae-32-e4269-gf3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ddb/11321187/e758c2d44abb/1518-8345-rlae-32-e4269-gf4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ddb/11321187/c6e4518f2937/1518-8345-rlae-32-e4269-gf5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ddb/11321187/855c0526e88a/1518-8345-rlae-32-e4269-gf6.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative study between high-fidelity simulation and medium-fidelity simulation in decision-making of nursing students: experimental study.高保真模拟与中保真模拟在护理学生决策中的比较研究:实验研究。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2024 Aug 12;32:e4269. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.6847.4269. eCollection 2024.
2
Satisfaction and gains perceived by nursing students with medium and high-fidelity simulation: A randomized controlled trial.护理专业学生对中高保真模拟的满意度及收获:一项随机对照试验。
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Nov;46:127-132. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.027. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
3
Is high-fidelity simulation-based training in emergency nursing effective in enhancing clinical decision-making skills? A mixed methods study.基于高保真模拟的急诊护理培训是否能有效提高临床决策技能?一项混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 May;69:103610. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103610. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
4
The impact of high-fidelity simulation on knowledge, critical thinking, and clinical decision-making for the management of pre-eclampsia.高保真模拟对先兆子痫管理的知识、批判性思维和临床决策的影响。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Sep;150(3):354-360. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13243. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
5
Great geriatric syndromes: Acquisition of nursing competencies and undergraduate nursing students' perceptions through high-fidelity simulation training.重大老年综合征:通过高仿真模拟训练培养护理能力及本科护生的认知
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Feb;121:105685. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105685. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
6
Socioemotional Skills in the Teaching-Learning Process Mediated by Medium- and High-Fidelity Clinical Simulation in Nursing Students: Protocol for a Scoping Review.护理专业学生在中高仿真临床模拟教学-学习过程中的社会情感技能:系统评价方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 19;13:e56436. doi: 10.2196/56436.
7
The effects of using high-fidelity simulators and standardized patients on the thorax, lung, and cardiac examination skills of undergraduate nursing students.使用高保真模拟器和标准化病人对本科护生胸部、肺部及心脏检查技能的影响。
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Oct;45:120-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
8
The effects of training with simulation on knowledge, skill and anxiety levels of the nursing students in terms of cardiac auscultation: A randomized controlled study.模拟训练对护理专业学生在心脏听诊方面的知识、技能和焦虑水平的影响:一项随机对照研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jan;84:104216. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104216. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
9
Use of simulation from high fidelity to low fidelity in teaching of safe-medication practices.在安全用药实践教学中从高保真模拟到低保真模拟的应用。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2019 Feb;69(2):195-200.
10
Nursing Students' Satisfaction: A Comparison between Medium- and High-Fidelity Simulation Training.护生对中、高仿真模拟训练的满意度比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 19;18(2):804. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020804.

引用本文的文献

1
Validating high-fidelity simulation for assessing procedural skills in nursing education: a kane framework approach in Ghana.验证高保真模拟在护理教育中评估操作技能的有效性:加纳的凯恩框架方法
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 18;25(1):1170. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07724-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of High-Fidelity Simulation on Clinical Judgment Among Nursing Students.高仿真模拟对护理学生临床判断的影响。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221081997. doi: 10.1177/00469580221081997.
2
The Effects of the 5-step Method for Infant Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Attitude, and Performance Ability.五步婴儿心肺复苏培训法对护生知识、态度及操作能力的影响
Child Health Nurs Res. 2019 Jan;25(1):17-27. doi: 10.4094/chnr.2019.25.1.17. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
3
Effectiveness of using simulation in the development of clinical reasoning in undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review.
使用模拟在本科护生临床推理能力发展中的效果:系统评价。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Nov;57:103220. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103220. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
4
Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale (CDMNS-PT©) in nursing students: translation and validation.临床护理决策量表(CDMNS-PT©)在护理学生中的应用:翻译与验证。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 Sep 1;74(suppl 6):e20210032. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0032. eCollection 2021.
5
Strategies of active learning methodologies in nursing education: an integrative literature review.护理教育中主动学习方法的策略:一项综合文献综述。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 Mar 24;74(1):e20200130. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0130. eCollection 2021.
6
Effects of a Clinical Simulation Course about Basic Life Support on Undergraduate Nursing Students' Learning.基础生命支持临床模拟课程对本科护生学习效果的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 3;18(4):1409. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041409.
7
Nursing Students' Satisfaction: A Comparison between Medium- and High-Fidelity Simulation Training.护生对中、高仿真模拟训练的满意度比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 19;18(2):804. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020804.
8
Basic Life Support Training for undergraduate nursing students: An integrative review.本科护生基础生命支持培训:一项综合评价。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Jan;50:102957. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102957. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
9
Effects of a Complex Case Study and High-Fidelity Simulation on Mechanical Ventilation on Knowledge and Clinical Judgment of Undergraduate Nursing Students.一项复杂病例研究和高保真模拟对本科护生机械通气知识和临床判断影响的研究
Nurse Educ. 2021;46(4):E64-E69. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000938.
10
A Cross-International Study to Evaluate Knowledge and Attitudes Related to Basic Life Support among Undergraduate Nursing Students-A Questionnaire Study.一项跨国际研究,评估本科护理学生基本生命支持相关知识和态度-问卷调查研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 9;17(11):4116. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114116.