Simsek Mehmet Emin, Akkaya Mustafa, Gursoy Safa, Isik Cetin, Zahar Akos, Tarabichi Samih, Bozkurt Murat
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara Yenimahalle Training and Research Hospital, Yildirim Beyazit University, 06100, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Yildirim Beyazit University, 06100, Ankara, Turkey.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Mar;138(3):409-418. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2850-4. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
To investigate the appropriate mediolateral placement of symmetrical tibial components and the amount of overhang expected from the posterolateral of tibial components implanted to give ideal coverage and the subsequent incidence of residual knee pain and reduction in functional capacity.
A retrospective evaluation was made of 146 consecutive total knee arthroplasties. The posterolateral overhang, rotational alignment and coverage of the tibial component were measured on a post-operative CT scan and the effect of posterolateral overhang on clinical outcomes was analysed 3 years after surgery.
Complaints of local pain in the posterolateral corner were determined in 76 (52.1%) patients. At the Posterolateral corner, overhang was determined in 111 (76%) patients, in the cortical border in 11 (7.6%) patients and underhang in 24 (16.4%) patients. In 71 (48.6%) patients, pain was determined together with oversize and in the evaluation of the overhang of the tibial component in the posterolateral region and the rotation status, there was determined to be overhang in 75 (96.2%) patients where the tibial component was placed in ideal rotation, in 25 (100%) where placement was in external rotation and in 11 (25.6%) where placement was in internal rotation. The mean KSS, KSS-F and WOMAC-P scores were 83.9 ± 6.3, 83.3 ± 7.8 and 4.6 ± 2.9, respectively, in those with posterolateral overhang of the tibial component .The mean KSS, KSS-F and WOMAC-P scores were 86.6 ± 8.4, 89.5 ± 7.8 and 2.8 ± 2.1, respectively, in those with no overhang and the difference was determined to be statistically significant. The amount of overhang was determined as mean 3.6 ± 2.0 mm in those with posterolateral pain and 0.02 ± 3.4 mm in those without pain and the difference was statistically significant.
This study demonstrated that overhang in the posterolateral region is surprisingly high and negatively affects the clinical results following TKA, thereby presenting a danger to the success of TKA. The risk of posterolateral oversizing can increase with placement of the tibial component in external rotation.
研究对称胫骨部件的合适内外侧放置位置,以及植入胫骨部件后外侧预期的悬出量,以实现理想覆盖,并探讨后续残留膝关节疼痛的发生率及功能能力的降低情况。
对146例连续的全膝关节置换术进行回顾性评估。在术后CT扫描上测量胫骨部件的后外侧悬出量、旋转对线和覆盖情况,并分析术后3年时后外侧悬出对临床结果的影响。
76例(52.1%)患者存在后外侧角局部疼痛主诉。在后外侧角,111例(76%)患者存在悬出,11例(7.6%)患者在皮质边缘有悬出,24例(16.4%)患者存在内陷。71例(48.6%)患者疼痛与尺寸过大同时存在,在评估胫骨部件后外侧区域的悬出情况和旋转状态时,发现胫骨部件处于理想旋转位置的75例(96.2%)患者存在悬出,处于外旋位置的25例(100%)患者存在悬出,处于内旋位置的11例(25.6%)患者存在悬出。胫骨部件后外侧有悬出的患者,其平均膝关节协会评分(KSS)、KSS功能评分(KSS-F)和西方安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数疼痛评分(WOMAC-P)分别为83.9±6.3、83.3±7.8和4.6±2.9。无悬出的患者,其平均KSS、KSS-F和WOMAC-P评分分别为86.6±8.4、89.5±7.8和2.8±2.1,差异具有统计学意义。后外侧疼痛患者的悬出量平均为3.6±2.0毫米,无疼痛患者的悬出量为0.02±3.4毫米,差异具有统计学意义。
本研究表明,后外侧区域的悬出量惊人地高,对全膝关节置换术后的临床结果产生负面影响,从而对全膝关节置换术的成功构成危险。胫骨部件外旋放置可能会增加后外侧尺寸过大的风险。