• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

持续性接触过敏:回顾性分析。

Persistence of contact allergy: a retrospective analysis.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Social Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Feb;78(2):143-150. doi: 10.1111/cod.12912. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1111/cod.12912
PMID:29178341
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that not all positive patch test reactions are reproducible upon retesting, that is, persistent. Non-persistent reactions might represent initial false-positive reactions, meaning that patients might unnecessarily avoid allergens.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the occurrence of both persistent and non-persistent patch test reactions, to explore possible explanations, and to investigate whether allergen-specific differences exist.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who were patch tested at least twice between 1 January 1995 and 31 October 2016, with at least one positive patch test reaction to an allergen that had been retested. Both univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to investigate the influence of several factors on persistence.

RESULTS

Of 274 retested positive reactions in 119 patients, 183 (66.8%) reactions remained positive. The strongest predictor for non-persistence in both univariable and multivariable analyses was strength of the first patch test, with weak positive reactions being significantly less persistent. Regarding allergen groups, metals and fragrances were less persistent than other allergens.

CONCLUSION

Weak positive reactions have a low persistence rate, and the dermatologist should be conservative in advising the patient on avoidance of these allergens, especially if clinical relevance is uncertain.

摘要

背景

研究表明,并非所有阳性斑贴试验反应在重新检测时都是可重现的,即持续存在的。非持续反应可能代表最初的假阳性反应,这意味着患者可能不必要地避免了过敏原。

目的

调查持续性和非持续性斑贴试验反应的发生情况,探讨可能的解释,并研究是否存在过敏原特异性差异。

方法

对 1995 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 10 月 31 日期间至少两次斑贴试验且至少有一个阳性斑贴试验反应被重新检测的患者进行回顾性分析。进行单变量和多变量分析,以研究多种因素对持续性的影响。

结果

在 119 名患者的 274 个重复阳性反应中,183 个(66.8%)反应仍为阳性。在单变量和多变量分析中,非持续性的最强预测因素是首次斑贴试验的强度,弱阳性反应的持续性明显较低。就过敏原组而言,金属和香料比其他过敏原的持续性低。

结论

弱阳性反应的持续性低,皮肤科医生在建议患者避免这些过敏原时应持保守态度,尤其是如果临床相关性不确定的话。

相似文献

1
Persistence of contact allergy: a retrospective analysis.持续性接触过敏:回顾性分析。
Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Feb;78(2):143-150. doi: 10.1111/cod.12912. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
2
Use of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Standard 65-allergen series alone in the evaluation of allergic contact dermatitis: a series of 794 patients.单独使用北美接触性皮炎组标准65过敏原系列评估过敏性接触性皮炎:794例患者系列研究
Dermatitis. 2008 May-Jun;19(3):137-41.
3
Patch Testing for Methylisothiazolinone and Methylchloroisothiazolinone-Methylisothiazolinone Contact Allergy.甲基异噻唑啉酮和甲基氯异噻唑啉酮-甲基异噻唑啉酮接触过敏的斑贴试验。
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Jan;152(1):67-72. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.3606.
4
Sorbitan sesquioleate; a rare cause of contact allergy in consecutively patch tested dermatitis patients.脱水山梨醇倍半油酸酯;连续进行斑贴试验的皮炎患者中接触性过敏的罕见原因。
Contact Dermatitis. 2016 Apr;74(4):242-5. doi: 10.1111/cod.12536. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
5
Strong allergic patch test reactions may indicate a general disposition for contact allergy.强烈的过敏性斑贴试验反应可能表明存在接触性过敏的总体倾向。
Allergy. 2006 Mar;61(3):364-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.00998.x.
6
Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.对转诊至接触性皮炎诊所的既往接受过斑贴试验的患者进行评估。
Am J Contact Dermat. 1997 Mar;8(1):10-4.
7
Patch test results with the metalworking fluid series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG).德国接触性皮炎研究小组(DKG)金属加工液系列的斑贴试验结果。
Contact Dermatitis. 2004 Sep;51(3):118-30. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00416.x.
8
The profile of patch test reactions to common contact allergens is related to sex.对常见接触性变应原的斑贴试验反应情况与性别有关。
Contact Dermatitis. 2008 Jan;58(1):37-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01254.x.
9
Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.在标准系列和补充化妆品系列中对个人护理产品过敏原进行斑贴试验的结果:2000-2007 年梅奥诊所接触性皮炎组对 945 例患者的分析。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Nov;63(5):789-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.11.033.
10
Relevance of positive patch-test reactions to fragrance mix.对香料混合物的阳性斑贴试验反应的相关性
Dermatitis. 2008 Jan-Feb;19(1):43-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The long-term effect of dupilumab on chronic hand eczema in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis-52 week results from the Dutch BioDay Registry.度普利尤单抗治疗中重度特应性皮炎患者慢性手部湿疹的长期疗效:荷兰 BioDay 登记研究 52 周结果。
Contact Dermatitis. 2022 Aug;87(2):185-191. doi: 10.1111/cod.14104. Epub 2022 Apr 24.
2
Immunological Mechanisms of Metal Allergies and the Nickel-Specific TCR-pMHC Interface.金属过敏的免疫机制和镍特异性 TCR-pMHC 界面。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 15;18(20):10867. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010867.
3
Effects of dupilumab treatment on patch test reactions: A retrospective evaluation.
度普利尤单抗治疗对斑贴试验反应的影响:一项回顾性评估。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2021 Jul;51(7):959-967. doi: 10.1111/cea.13892. Epub 2021 May 30.
4
Contact Allergy-Emerging Allergens and Public Health Impact.接触性过敏反应-新兴过敏原和公共卫生影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 1;17(7):2404. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072404.
5
Effect of dupilumab on hand eczema in patients with atopic dermatitis: An observational study.度普利尤单抗治疗特应性皮炎患者手部湿疹的疗效:一项观察性研究。
J Dermatol. 2019 Aug;46(8):680-685. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.14982. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
6
New positive patch test reactions on day 7-The additional value of the day 7 patch test reading.第七天出现新的阳性斑贴试验反应-第七天斑贴试验读数的附加价值。
Contact Dermatitis. 2019 Oct;81(4):280-287. doi: 10.1111/cod.13322. Epub 2019 Jun 11.