Suppr超能文献

在左束支传导阻滞患者中,二维超声心动图是否高估了左心室射血分数?

Do we overestimate left ventricular ejection fraction by two-dimensional echocardiography in patients with left bundle branch block?

作者信息

Cabuk Ali K, Cabuk Gizem, Sayin Ahmet, Karamanlioglu Murat, Kilicaslan Barış, Ekmekci Cenk, Solmaz Hatice, Aslanturk Omer F, Ozdogan Oner

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

Department of Cardiology, Buca Seyfidemirsoy State Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Echocardiography. 2018 Feb;35(2):148-152. doi: 10.1111/echo.13758. Epub 2017 Nov 26.

Abstract

AIMS

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) causes a dyssynchronized contraction of left ventricle. This is a kind of regional wall-motion abnormality and measuring left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography could be less reliable in this particular condition. Our aim was to evaluate the role of dyssynchrony index (SDI), measured by three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography, in assessment of LVEF and left ventricular volumes accurately in patients with LBBB.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this case-control study, we included 52 of 64 enrolled participants (twelve participants with poor image quality were excluded) with LBBB and normal LVEF or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular volumes were assessed by 2D (modified Simpson's rule) and 3D (four beats full volume analysis) echocardiography and the impact of SDI on results were evaluated. In patients with SDI ≥6%, LVEF measurements were significantly different (46.00% [29.50-52.50] vs 37.60% [24.70-45.15], P < .001) between 2D and 3D echocardiography, respectively. In patients with SDI < 6%, there were no significant differences between two modalities in terms of LVEF measurements (54.50% [49.00-59.00] vs 54.25% [40.00-58.25], P = .193). LV diastolic volumes were not significantly different while systolic volumes were underestimated by 2D echocardiography, and this finding was more pronounced when SDI ≥ 6%.

CONCLUSION

In patients with LBBB and high SDI (≥6%), LVEF values were overestimated and systolic volumes were underestimated by 2D echocardiography compared to 3D echocardiography.

摘要

目的

左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)会导致左心室收缩不同步。这是一种局部室壁运动异常,在此特定情况下,通过二维(2D)超声心动图测量左心室射血分数(LVEF)可能不太可靠。我们的目的是评估通过三维(3D)超声心动图测量的不同步指数(SDI)在准确评估LBBB患者的LVEF和左心室容积中的作用。

方法与结果

在这项病例对照研究中,我们纳入了64名登记参与者中的52名(排除了12名图像质量差的参与者),他们患有LBBB且LVEF正常或患有非缺血性心肌病。通过二维(改良Simpson法则)和三维(四搏全容积分析)超声心动图评估左心室射血分数(LVEF)和左心室容积,并评估SDI对结果的影响。在SDI≥6%的患者中,二维和三维超声心动图测量的LVEF分别有显著差异(46.00% [29.50 - 52.50] 与37.60% [24.70 - 45.15],P <.001)。在SDI < 6% 的患者中,两种检查方式在LVEF测量方面无显著差异(54.50% [49.00 - 59.00] 与54.25% [40.00 - 58.25],P =.193)。左心室舒张末期容积无显著差异,而二维超声心动图低估了收缩末期容积,当SDI≥6%时这一发现更为明显。

结论

在LBBB且SDI高(≥6%)的患者中,与三维超声心动图相比,二维超声心动图高估了LVEF值且低估了收缩末期容积。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验