Suppr超能文献

与三维分析相比,二维门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)分析高估了存在局部不同步的患者的左心室射血分数。

Compared with 3-dimensional analysis, 2-dimensional gated SPECT analysis overestimates left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with regional dyssynchrony.

作者信息

Kasai Tokuo, Depuey E Gordon, Shah Arshad Ali

机构信息

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Nucl Cardiol. 2004 Mar-Apr;11(2):159-64. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2003.11.005.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) is a powerful prognostic predictor in patients with heart disease. However, LVEF calculated by 2-dimensional (2D) modalities such as echocardiography by use of the "modified" Simpson's rule may be incorrect in patients with regional dyssynchrony, presumably because regions of dyssynchrony are excluded from analysis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To elucidate the difference between 2D and 3-dimensional (3D) methods with regard to LVEF calculation in patients with regional dyssynchrony, we compared LVEF derived from 8-frame gated technetium 99m sestamibi stress perfusion tomograms using commercially available 2D single photon emission computed tomography (SPECTEF) software that uses the modified Simpson's rule, 3D QGS, and investigational 3D p-FAST software in 136 left bundle branch block patients. Twenty-four patients had normal wall motion, whereas one hundred twelve showed septal dyssynchrony. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that compared with QGS and p-FAST, SPECTEF overestimated LVEF in patients with septal dyssynchrony systemically by 8.6% and 11.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that compared with 3D modalities, 2D modalities that use the modified Simpson's rule, such as SPECT EF, overestimate LVEF in patients with dyssynchronous septal wall motion. Therefore 3D modalities are preferred to evaluate patients with regional dyssynchrony.

摘要

背景

左心室射血分数(LVEF)是心脏病患者强有力的预后预测指标。然而,对于存在节段性不同步的患者,通过二维(2D)方法(如使用“改良”辛普森法则的超声心动图)计算的LVEF可能不准确,推测是因为不同步区域被排除在分析之外。

方法与结果

为阐明在节段性不同步患者中2D和三维(3D)方法在LVEF计算方面的差异,我们在136例左束支传导阻滞患者中,比较了使用改良辛普森法则的商用2D单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECTEF)软件、3D QGS软件以及研究性3D p-FAST软件从8帧门控锝99m甲氧基异丁基异腈心肌灌注断层扫描得出的LVEF。24例患者壁运动正常,而112例存在室间隔不同步。布兰德-奥特曼图显示,与QGS和p-FAST相比,SPECTEF在存在室间隔不同步的患者中分别系统性地高估LVEF 8.6%和11.3%。

结论

我们得出结论,与3D方法相比,使用改良辛普森法则的2D方法(如SPECT EF)在室间隔壁运动不同步的患者中高估LVEF。因此,在评估节段性不同步患者时,3D方法更可取。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验