Belden Jeffery L, Koopman Richelle J, Patil Sonal J, Lowrance Nathan J, Petroski Gregory F, Smith Jamie B
From the Department of Family and Community Medicine (JLB, RJK, SJP, JBS), the School of Information Science and Learning Technologies, College of Education (NJL), the Department of Health Management & Informatics (GFP), and the Informatics Institute (JLB), University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Nov-Dec;30(6):691-700. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.06.170028.
Cluttered documentation may contribute adversely to physician readers' cognitive load, inadvertently obscuring high-value information with less valuable information. We test the hypothesis that a novel, collapsible assessment, plan, subjective, objective (APSO) note design would be faster, more accurate, and more satisfying to use than a conventional electronic health record (EHR) subjective, objective, assessment, plan (SOAP) note for finding information needed for ambulatory chronic disease care.
We iteratively developed physician clinic note prototypes with features designed to emphasize more important information and de-emphasize less clinically relevant information. Sixteen primary care physicians reviewed comparable clinic notes with the 4 note styles presented in random order to find key information in the notes during timed tasks. The 4 note styles were denoted A (traditional SOAP note), B (2-column APSO note), C (collapsible APSO note), and D (2-column collapsible APSO note). The 4 unique note styles were designed to have equal amounts of information in each section. We simulated their utility for clinical practice by imposing time limits and by interrupting 1 of the tasks with a typical clinical interruption. For each session, we recorded audio, computer-screen activity, eye tracking, and made field notes. We obtained usability ratings (System Usability Scale), new feature preference ratings, and performed semistructured post-task interviews with subsequent content analysis. We compared the effectiveness of the 4 note styles by measuring time on task, task success (accuracy), and effort as measured by NASA Task Load Index.
Note styles C and D were significantly faster than A and B for the Review of Systems and Physical Examination tasks, as we expected. Notes B and C had the best success (finding requested data) scores. Users strongly endorsed all the new note features incorporated into the new note prototypes. Previously expressed concerns about temporarily hiding parts of the note (using the accordion display design pattern) were allayed. Usability ratings for note A were worst but comparably better for note styles B, C, and D.
The new APSO note prototypes performed better than the traditional SOAP note format for speed, task success (accuracy), and usability for physician users acquiring information needed for a typical chronic disease visit in primary care. Moving Assessment and Plan to the top is 1 easily accomplished feature change. Innovative documentation displays of EHR data can safely improve information display without eliminating data from the record of the visit.
杂乱的文档可能会对医生读者的认知负荷产生不利影响,不经意间用价值较低的信息掩盖了高价值信息。我们检验了这样一个假设:一种新颖的、可折叠的评估、计划、主观、客观(APSO)记录设计,与传统电子健康记录(EHR)的主观、客观、评估、计划(SOAP)记录相比,在查找门诊慢性病护理所需信息时,使用起来会更快、更准确且更令人满意。
我们迭代开发了医生临床记录原型,其功能旨在强调更重要的信息,并淡化与临床相关性较低的信息。16名初级保健医生以随机顺序查看了具有4种记录样式的可比临床记录,以便在限时任务中查找记录中的关键信息。这4种记录样式分别标记为A(传统SOAP记录)、B(两栏式APSO记录)、C(可折叠APSO记录)和D(两栏式可折叠APSO记录)。这4种独特的记录样式在每个部分设计了等量的信息。我们通过设定时间限制以及用典型的临床干扰打断其中一项任务,来模拟它们在临床实践中的效用。对于每个环节,我们记录了音频、电脑屏幕活动、眼动追踪,并做了现场笔记。我们获得了可用性评级(系统可用性量表)、新功能偏好评级,并在任务结束后进行了半结构化访谈,随后进行了内容分析。我们通过测量任务时间、任务成功率(准确性)以及用美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数衡量的工作量,来比较这4种记录样式的有效性。
正如我们所预期的,在系统回顾和体格检查任务中,记录样式C和D比A和B显著更快。记录样式B和C的成功率(找到所需数据)得分最高。用户强烈认可新记录原型中纳入的所有新记录功能。之前对暂时隐藏记录部分(使用手风琴式显示设计模式)表达的担忧得到了缓解。记录样式A的可用性评级最差,但记录样式B、C和D的可用性评级相对较好。
对于在初级保健中进行典型慢性病就诊获取所需信息的医生用户而言,新的APSO记录原型在速度、任务成功率(准确性)和可用性方面比传统的SOAP记录格式表现更好。将评估和计划移到顶部是一个易于实现的功能改变。EHR数据的创新文档显示可以在不消除就诊记录中的数据的情况下,安全地改善信息显示。