Suppr超能文献

临床文档的解剖结构:叙事记录部分格式和内容的评估和分类。

The anatomy of clinical documentation: an assessment and classification of narrative note sections format and content.

机构信息

Informatics Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:319-328. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

We systematically analyzed the most commonly used narrative note formats and content found in primary and specialty care visit notes to inform future research and electronic health record (EHR) development. We extracted data from the history of present illness (HPI) and impression and plan (IP) sections of 80 primary and specialty care visit notes. Two authors iteratively classified the format of the sections and compared the size of each section and the overall note size between primary and specialty care notes. We then annotated the content of these sections to develop a taxonomy of types of data communicated in the narrative note sections. Both HPI and IP were significantly longer in primary care when compared to specialty care notes (HPI: n = 187 words, SD[130] vs. n = 119 words, SD [53]; p = 0.004 / IP: n = 270 words, SD [145] vs. n = 170 words, SD [101]; p < 0.001). Although we did not find a significant difference in the overall note size between the two groups, the proportion of HPI and IP content in relation to the total note size was significantly higher in primary care notes (40%, SD [13] vs. 28%, SD [11]; p < 0.001). We identified five combinations of format of HPI + IP sections respectively: (A) story + list with categories; (B) story + story; (C) list without categories + list with categories; (D) list with categories + list with categories; and (E) list with categories + story. HPI and IP content was significantly smaller in combination C compared to combination A (-172 words, [95% Conf. -326, -17.89]; p = 0.02). We identified seven taxa representing 45 different types of data: finding/condition documented (n = 14), intervention documented (n = 9), general descriptions and definitions (n = 7), temporal information (n = 6), reasons and justifications (n = 4), participants and settings (n = 4), and clinical documentation (n = 1). We identified commonly used narrative note section formats and developed a taxonomy of narrative note content to help researchers to tailor their efforts and design more efficient clinical documentation systems.

摘要

我们系统地分析了初级保健和专科就诊记录中最常用的叙述性记录格式和内容,以指导未来的研究和电子健康记录(EHR)的开发。我们从 80 份初级保健和专科就诊记录的现病史(HPI)和印象与计划(IP)部分提取数据。两位作者对各部分的格式进行了迭代分类,并比较了初级保健和专科就诊记录中各部分的大小和整个记录的大小。然后,我们对这些部分的内容进行注释,以开发一个在叙述性记录部分中传达的数据类型分类法。与专科就诊记录相比,HPI 和 IP 在初级保健中明显更长(HPI:n = 187 个单词,SD[130] vs. n = 119 个单词,SD[53];p = 0.004 / IP:n = 270 个单词,SD[145] vs. n = 170 个单词,SD[101];p < 0.001)。尽管我们没有发现两组之间整体记录大小的显著差异,但 HPI 和 IP 内容在总记录大小中的比例在初级保健记录中明显更高(40%,SD[13] vs. 28%,SD[11];p < 0.001)。我们分别确定了 HPI + IP 部分格式的五种组合:(A)有类别故事列表;(B)故事加故事;(C)无类别列表加有类别列表;(D)有类别列表加有类别列表;和(E)有类别列表加故事。与组合 A 相比,组合 C 中的 HPI 和 IP 内容明显更小(-172 个单词,[95%置信区间-326,-17.89];p = 0.02)。我们确定了 7 个代表 45 种不同类型数据的分类法:已记录的发现/情况(n = 14)、已记录的干预措施(n = 9)、一般描述和定义(n = 7)、时间信息(n = 6)、原因和理由(n = 4)、参与者和环境(n = 4)和临床记录(n = 1)。我们确定了常用的叙述性记录部分格式,并开发了叙述性记录内容的分类法,以帮助研究人员有针对性地开展工作,并设计更有效的临床记录系统。

相似文献

2
Physicians' perceptions about narrative note sections format and content: A multi-specialty survey.
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Jul;151:104475. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104475. Epub 2021 May 7.
3
Dynamic Electronic Health Record Note Prototype: Seeing More by Showing Less.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Nov-Dec;30(6):691-700. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.06.170028.
4
Resident Notes in an Electronic Health Record.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2017 Mar;56(3):257-262. doi: 10.1177/0009922816658651. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
5
Physician Information Needs and Electronic Health Records (EHRs): Time to Reengineer the Clinic Note.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 May-Jun;28(3):316-23. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140244.
7
Impact of clinical note format on diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.
Health Inf Manag. 2024 Sep;53(3):183-188. doi: 10.1177/18333583231151979. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
8
An electronic documentation system improves the quality of admission notes: a randomized trial.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):123-129. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw064. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
9
A comparative observational study of inpatient clinical note-entry and reading/retrieval styles adopted by physicians.
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Jun;90:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
10
Determining primary care physician information needs to inform ambulatory visit note display.
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Feb 26;5(1):169-90. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-08-RA-0064. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Formal representation of patients' care context data: the path to improving the electronic health record.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Nov 1;27(11):1648-1657. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa134.
2
Health information technology as a learning health system: Call for a national monitoring system.
Learn Health Syst. 2019 Nov 20;4(1):e10207. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10207. eCollection 2020.
5
An Exploration of the Terminology of Clinical Cognition and Reasoning.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:321-329. eCollection 2018.
6
Physician Burnout in the Electronic Health Record Era.
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Feb 5;170(3):216-217. doi: 10.7326/L18-0604.
8
Transitioning Patients From Specialty Care to Primary Care: What We Know and What We Can Do.
J Ambul Care Manage. 2018 Oct/Dec;41(4):314-322. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000253.
9
Electronic Health Record Usability Issues and Potential Contribution to Patient Harm.
JAMA. 2018 Mar 27;319(12):1276-1278. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1171.
10
Toward Medical Documentation That Enhances Situational Awareness Learning.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017 Feb 10;2016:763-771. eCollection 2016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验