• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对卫生专业学员的离散选择实验,以改善阿巴拉契亚地区城乡医疗服务可及性差距:研究方案。

A discrete choice experiment with health professions trainees to improve the urban-rural health care access disparity in Appalachia: Study protocol.

作者信息

Gillette Chris, Ostermann Jan, Garvick Sarah, Everett Chris, Caviness Dawn, Aguilar Aylin A

机构信息

Department of PA Studies, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America.

Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 13;20(1):e0316521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316521. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0316521
PMID:39804887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11729937/
Abstract

Globally, those who live in rural areas experience significant barriers to accessing health care due to a maldistribution of health care providers. Those who live in rural areas in the Appalachian region of the United States face one of the worst shortages of health care providers despite experiencing more complex health needs compared to Americans in more affluent, urban areas. Prior research has failed to identify effective solutions to narrow the provider maldistribution, despite it being a policy focus for decades. More work is needed to better understand the complex, multidimensional process in which health care providers select jobs and how job, community, and providers' intrapersonal characteristics influence job selection. This paper is a protocol for a study aimed at identifying effective policies and incentives to improve recruitment of healthcare providers for their first job in rural Appalachia. We will use rigorous, theoretically grounded discrete choice experiment methodology (DCE) to accomplish the study's objective. The main outcome will be the relative importance of alternative community and job characteristics for trainees' choices of jobs in rural Appalachia. secondary outcomes of interest will be trade-offs that these trainees make when selecting a job, described in the form of marginal rates of substitution (mRS). Participants include medical residents and fellows, PA students and NP students in their final year of training. The choice context will be the recruitment of these trainees for their first job. Data will be analyzed using mixed logit analysis. Results from this DCE will improve our understanding of the job selection process for health care providers. The identification and prioritization of predictors of trainees' rural job choices will allow for the development of policies and incentives that will enable policymakers and health care systems to recruit more providers to rural and underserved areas.

摘要

在全球范围内,由于医疗服务提供者分布不均,农村地区居民在获得医疗保健方面面临重大障碍。美国阿巴拉契亚地区农村的居民面临着最严重的医疗服务提供者短缺问题之一,尽管与更富裕的城市地区的美国人相比,他们面临着更复杂的健康需求。尽管数十年来这一直是政策重点,但先前的研究未能找到缩小医疗服务提供者分布不均的有效解决方案。需要开展更多工作,以更好地理解医疗服务提供者选择工作的复杂多维度过程,以及工作、社区和提供者的个人特征如何影响工作选择。本文是一项研究的方案,旨在确定有效的政策和激励措施,以改善农村阿巴拉契亚地区医疗服务提供者的首次就业招聘情况。我们将使用严格的、基于理论的离散选择实验方法(DCE)来实现该研究目标。主要结果将是替代社区和工作特征对农村阿巴拉契亚地区实习生工作选择的相对重要性。感兴趣的次要结果将是这些实习生在选择工作时所做的权衡,以边际替代率(mRS)的形式描述。参与者包括医学住院医师和研究员、医师助理(PA)学生和护理执业医师(NP)学生最后一年的培训学员。选择背景将是这些学员的首次就业招聘。数据将使用混合逻辑回归分析进行分析。该DCE的结果将增进我们对医疗服务提供者工作选择过程的理解。确定实习生农村工作选择的预测因素并对其进行优先级排序,将有助于制定政策和激励措施,使政策制定者和医疗保健系统能够招募更多提供者到农村和服务不足地区工作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1efb/11729937/a2f2d2104b28/pone.0316521.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1efb/11729937/b2caf0f79c85/pone.0316521.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1efb/11729937/a1c182fb1dc9/pone.0316521.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1efb/11729937/5be94b67dfc7/pone.0316521.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1efb/11729937/a2f2d2104b28/pone.0316521.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1efb/11729937/b2caf0f79c85/pone.0316521.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1efb/11729937/a1c182fb1dc9/pone.0316521.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1efb/11729937/5be94b67dfc7/pone.0316521.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1efb/11729937/a2f2d2104b28/pone.0316521.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A discrete choice experiment with health professions trainees to improve the urban-rural health care access disparity in Appalachia: Study protocol.一项针对卫生专业学员的离散选择实验,以改善阿巴拉契亚地区城乡医疗服务可及性差距:研究方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 13;20(1):e0316521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316521. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessment of interventions to attract and retain health workers in rural Zambia: a discrete choice experiment.评估赞比亚农村吸引和留住卫生工作者的干预措施:离散选择实验。
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Apr 3;17(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0359-3.
3
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.
4
Incentivizing Rural Work Preferences Among Specialist Physicians: Protocol for a Discrete Choice Experiment.激励专科医生对农村工作的偏好:一项离散选择实验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Dec 9;13:e59621. doi: 10.2196/59621.
5
Addressing concerns of access and distribution of health workforce: a discrete choice experiment to develop rural attraction and retention strategies in southwestern Ethiopia.解决卫生人力获取与分配问题:一项关于制定埃塞俄比亚西南部农村吸引和留住人才战略的离散选择实验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1603. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11971-4.
6
Incentives for non-physician health professionals to work in the rural and remote areas of Mozambique--a discrete choice experiment for eliciting job preferences.激励非医师卫生专业人员到莫桑比克农村和偏远地区工作——一项用于引出工作偏好的离散选择实验。
Hum Resour Health. 2015 Apr 26;13:23. doi: 10.1186/s12960-015-0015-5.
7
Job preferences of undergraduate nursing students in eastern China: a discrete choice experiment.中国东部本科护生工作偏好的离散选择实验研究
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Jan 3;17(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0335-3.
8
Rural clinician scarcity and job preferences of doctors and nurses in India: a discrete choice experiment.印度农村临床医生短缺与医生和护士工作偏好:离散选择实验。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e82984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082984. eCollection 2013.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
The influence of loan repayment on rural healthcare provider recruitment and retention in Colorado.贷款偿还对科罗拉多州农村医疗服务提供者招聘和留用的影响。
Rural Remote Health. 2010 Oct-Dec;10(4):1605. Epub 2010 Nov 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Reimagining Rural Health Equity: Understanding Disparities And Orienting Policy, Practice, And Research In Rural America.重新构想农村健康公平:理解美国农村的差异并为农村的政策、实践和研究指明方向。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Jun;43(6):791-797. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00036.
2
Current Programs and Incentives to Overcome Rural Physician Shortages in the United States: A Narrative Review.当前美国克服农村医生短缺的计划和激励措施:叙事性综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jul;38(Suppl 3):916-922. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08122-6. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
3
Contextualizing Appalachian health needs.
将阿巴拉契亚地区的健康需求置于背景中考量。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023 Jan 24;18:100428. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100428. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
A Cross-Sectional, Mixed-Methods Analysis to Identify the Relative Importance of Factors Students and Providers Evaluate When Making a Job Choice.一项横断面混合方法分析,旨在确定学生和提供者在做出工作选择时评估因素的相对重要性。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2022;33(4):1891-1904. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2022.0144.
5
Job attributes valued by physicians, PAs, and NPs: A cross-sectional survey.医生、医师助理和执业护士看重的工作属性:一项横断面调查。
JAAPA. 2022 Sep 1;35(9):46-50. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000854532.13833.74.
6
Access to Health Care in Appalachia: Perception and Reality.阿巴拉契亚地区的医疗保健服务:认知与现实
J Appalach Health. 2021 Oct 25;3(4):123-136. doi: 10.13023/jah.0304.10. eCollection 2021.
7
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests.定性研究中饱和度的样本量:实证检验的系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
8
Pipelines to Pathways: Medical School Commitment to Producing a Rural Workforce.从管道到途径:医学院致力于培养农村卫生人才
J Rural Health. 2021 Sep;37(4):723-733. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12542. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
9
Pipeline Programs Can Support Reforms in Medical Education: A Cohort Study of Alabama's Rural Health Leaders Pipeline to Engage Community Leaders.管道项目可以支持医学教育改革:阿拉巴马农村卫生领导人管道参与社区领导人计划的队列研究。
J Rural Health. 2021 Sep;37(4):745-754. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12531. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
10
Implications Of The Rapid Growth Of The Nurse Practitioner Workforce In The US.美国执业护士劳动力快速增长的影响
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Feb;39(2):273-279. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00686.