Hafford-Letchfield Trish, Simpson Paul, Willis Paul B, Almack Kathryn
School of Health and Education, Middlesex University, London, UK.
Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Mar;26(2):e312-e320. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12521. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
There have been substantial achievements in legislative and human rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) older people and their visibility in health and social care has equally increased. These appear to have surpassed the ability of care services to meet their needs given documented concerns about the accessibility, inclusiveness and safety of care services particularly institutionalised care. This requires systemic change not easy to operationalise. This paper describes an action research initiative where six care homes belonging to a national care provider, collaborated to assess and develop their services with the support of local LGBT "Community Advisors" and academic partners. Framed within Rogers' (2003) change management framework and combined with a participatory leadership approach, a programme of intervention was implemented comprising structured activities around seven key areas thought to promote LGBT inclusion. A formal evaluation was conducted involving 35 pre- and post-intervention qualitative interviews with 18 people (community advisors; care home managers and senior managers). The findings are presented across three key themes (1) starting points on the journey; (2) challenges encountered along the journey (organisational and interpersonal); and (3) making change happen; opportunities, initiatives and gains. We make recommendations on the value of a programme approach for achieving tangible outcomes that demonstrate increased inclusion for older LGBT people living in long-term care settings.
在女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别(LGBT)老年人的立法和人权方面已经取得了重大成就,他们在健康和社会护理中的可见度也同样有所提高。鉴于有记录表明人们对护理服务,特别是机构化护理的可及性、包容性和安全性存在担忧,这些成就似乎已经超出了护理服务满足他们需求的能力。这需要进行系统性变革,而这并不容易实施。本文描述了一项行动研究倡议,一家全国性护理服务提供商旗下的六家护理院,在当地LGBT“社区顾问”和学术伙伴的支持下,合作评估并改进他们的服务。该倡议以罗杰斯(2003年)的变革管理框架为基础,并结合参与式领导方法,实施了一项干预计划,其中包括围绕七个被认为能促进LGBT包容性的关键领域开展的结构化活动。进行了一次正式评估,对18人(社区顾问、护理院经理和高级经理)进行了35次干预前后的定性访谈。研究结果围绕三个关键主题展开:(1)旅程的起点;(2)旅程中遇到的挑战(组织层面和人际层面);(3)推动变革;机会、举措和收获。我们就采用项目方法实现切实成果的价值提出建议,这些成果表明生活在长期护理机构中的老年LGBT人群的包容性有所提高。