• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《CIRCLE养老院指南:一份为养老院共同设计的关于包容 LGBTQ+群体的资源》

The CIRCLE Care Home Guide: A Co-Designed Resource on LGBTQ+ Inclusion for Care Homes.

作者信息

Keemink Jolie R, Hammond John, Collins Grace, Price Joseph, Wells Martin, Johnson Sallie, Rugg Susan A, Parish Martin, King Andrew, Almack Kathryn

机构信息

University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.

PPI Member, Canterbury, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70309. doi: 10.1111/hex.70309.

DOI:10.1111/hex.70309
PMID:40799116
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12344378/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many older LGBTQ+ people still face discrimination in care home settings, and many care home staff do not have the knowledge required to provide LGBTQ+ inclusive care. Despite the availability of valuable resources on LGBTQ+ inclusion, its widespread use in social care practice in the United Kingdom is lacking. To address this issue, the current study presents a novel resource on LGBTQ+ inclusion co-designed by older LGBTQ+ people, care home staff and researchers, developed to be usable in a care home context.

METHODS

Five older LGBTQ+ people, four care home staff and three researchers co-designed the novel resource in four online co-design meetings using an adapted experience-based co-design process. Co-design meetings were recorded to collect data on the co-design process. We organised an online focus group to collect data on how the co-design members had experienced the co-design process and their thoughts on the anticipated impact of the novel resource.

RESULTS

The co-design group successfully developed a resource that adds to existing resources by being fully co-designed by older LGBTQ+ people, care home staff and researchers. It prioritises positive actions care staff can take along someone's care journey, available in formats designed to work well in a care home environment. Further, the focus group data highlighted the power of lived experience, from perspectives of both older LGBTQ+ people and care staff. Both perspectives brought unique elements to the co-design sessions and are represented in the final resource.

CONCLUSION

Through an inclusive co-design process, we developed a new resource for care homes to support LGBTQ+ inclusive practice. Our findings demonstrate the importance of collaboration between older LGBTQ+ people and care home staff to develop resources for inclusive practice. The final version of the resource has been launched and future research will assess its impact in practice.

PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

The resource was fully co-designed by older LGBTQ+ people and care home staff. The wider project was supported by an older LGBTQ+ person as co-applicant.

摘要

背景

许多老年 LGBTQ+ 群体在养老院环境中仍面临歧视,而且许多养老院工作人员缺乏提供包容 LGBTQ+ 群体护理所需的知识。尽管有关于包容 LGBTQ+ 群体的宝贵资源,但在英国的社会护理实践中,这些资源并未得到广泛应用。为解决这一问题,本研究展示了一种由老年 LGBTQ+ 群体、养老院工作人员和研究人员共同设计的关于包容 LGBTQ+ 群体的新型资源,该资源专为养老院环境设计。

方法

五名老年 LGBTQ+ 群体成员、四名养老院工作人员和三名研究人员通过采用基于经验的适应性共同设计流程,在四次在线共同设计会议中共同设计了这一新型资源。共同设计会议进行了记录,以收集有关共同设计过程的数据。我们组织了一次在线焦点小组讨论,以收集有关共同设计成员对共同设计过程的体验以及他们对该新型资源预期影响的看法的数据。

结果

共同设计小组成功开发了一种资源,该资源通过由老年 LGBTQ+ 群体、养老院工作人员和研究人员进行全面共同设计,对现有资源进行了补充。它优先考虑护理人员在某人的护理过程中可以采取的积极行动,以适合养老院环境的形式提供。此外,焦点小组的数据突出了老年 LGBTQ+ 群体和护理人员的生活经验的力量。这两个视角都为共同设计会议带来了独特的元素,并在最终资源中得到体现。

结论

通过一个包容性的共同设计过程,我们为养老院开发了一种新资源,以支持包容 LGBTQ+ 群体的实践。我们的研究结果表明,老年 LGBTQ+ 群体与养老院工作人员之间合作对于开发包容性实践资源的重要性。该资源的最终版本已发布,未来的研究将评估其在实践中的影响。

患者和公众参与

该资源由老年 LGBTQ+ 群体和养老院工作人员全面共同设计。更广泛的项目由一名老年 LGBTQ+ 群体成员作为共同申请人提供支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f7/12344378/40bc03b17006/HEX-28-e70309-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f7/12344378/b799c8b6f6ee/HEX-28-e70309-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f7/12344378/40bc03b17006/HEX-28-e70309-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f7/12344378/b799c8b6f6ee/HEX-28-e70309-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f7/12344378/40bc03b17006/HEX-28-e70309-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The CIRCLE Care Home Guide: A Co-Designed Resource on LGBTQ+ Inclusion for Care Homes.《CIRCLE养老院指南:一份为养老院共同设计的关于包容 LGBTQ+群体的资源》
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70309. doi: 10.1111/hex.70309.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience for young people who have experienced online sexual abuse: the i-Minds non-randomised feasibility clinical trial and nested qualitative study.一项针对遭受网络性虐待的年轻人改善心理健康和人际恢复力的数字干预措施:i-Minds非随机可行性临床试验及嵌套定性研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(28):1-27. doi: 10.3310/THAL8732.
5
Technology-enabled CONTACT tracing in care homes in the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONTACT non-randomised mixed-methods feasibility study.新冠疫情期间养老院中基于技术的接触者追踪:CONTACT非随机混合方法可行性研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(24):1-24. doi: 10.3310/UHDN6497.
6
Communication support in care homes for older adults: Views and reported practices of speech and language therapists and care home activities staff in the UK.养老院中老年人的沟通支持:英国言语治疗师和养老院活动工作人员的观点和报告的做法。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Jul-Aug;59(4):1404-1421. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13010. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
7
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Remote and digital services in UK general practice 2021-2023: the Remote by Default 2 longitudinal qualitative study synopsis.2021 - 2023年英国全科医疗中的远程和数字服务:“默认远程”2纵向定性研究概要
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(31):1-49. doi: 10.3310/QQTT4411.
9
"You Are the Expert of Your Own Experience": A Thematic Analysis of Experiences of Autism and Gender Diversity in Adulthood.“你是自身经历的专家”:成年期自闭症与性别多样性经历的主题分析
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):300-311. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0111. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

本文引用的文献

1
The All Together Group: Co-Designing a Toolkit of Approaches and Resources for End-of-Life Care Planning With People With Intellectual Disabilities in Social Care Settings.全体协作小组:与社会护理环境中的智障人士共同设计一套临终关怀规划方法与资源工具包。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14174. doi: 10.1111/hex.14174.
2
My Wellbeing Journal: Development of a communication and goal-setting tool to improve care for older adults with chronic conditions and multimorbidity.我的健康日志:开发一种沟通和目标设定工具,以改善对患有慢性病和多种疾病的老年患者的护理。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13890. doi: 10.1111/hex.13890. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
3
LGBTQ + cultural competency training for health professionals: a systematic review.
LGBTQ+ 文化能力培训对卫生专业人员的影响:系统综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Aug 9;23(1):558. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04373-3.
4
Approaches to co-production of research in care homes: a scoping review.养老院研究联合生产的方法:一项范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 23;8(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00408-z.
5
A real eye-opener: Nursing home staff experiences of co-designing nursing home services together with residents.大开眼界:养老院工作人员与居民共同设计养老院服务的体验。
J Aging Stud. 2022 Sep;62:101059. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2022.101059. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
6
Experiences and Attitudes of the LGBTQ+ Community on Care/Nursing Homes.LGBTQ+群体在疗养院的经历与态度。
J Homosex. 2023 Nov 10;70(13):3075-3107. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2022.2086751. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
7
Inequalities in older LGBT people's health and care needs in the United Kingdom: a systematic scoping review.英国老年 LGBT 群体健康与护理需求的不平等:一项系统的范围综述。
Ageing Soc. 2021 Mar;41(3):493-515. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X19001326. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
8
Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based guidelines in long-term care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.实施长期护理循证指南的障碍和促进因素:定性证据综合。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jul 9;16(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01140-0.
9
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews.健康领域的研究共同设计:综述快速概览。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 11;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9.
10
A Systematic Review of UK Educational and Training Materials Aimed at Health and Social Care Staff about Providing Appropriate Services for LGBT+ People.英国面向健康和社会关怀工作人员的教育和培训材料系统评价,旨在为 LGBT+人群提供适当服务。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 7;16(24):4976. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16244976.