• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干预措施解决了居住和家庭护理环境中护理人员对老年 LGBTQ+人群的看法:范围综述方案。

Interventions addressing care staff views of older LGBTQ+ people in residential and homecare settings: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

Centre for Adult Social Care Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 23;14(10):e086497. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086497.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086497
PMID:39448214
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11499820/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Previous research has identified that lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer (LGBTQ+) social care service users have concerns and/or negative experiences of their care due to staff views and attitudes about them/their sexual and gender identities. This has resulted in a number of barriers and challenges for the delivery of social care to this population. However, there is a little research relating to what types of evidence-based interventions can help overcome these barriers, enhance knowledge and promote positive attitude change in staff. The objective of this review was to systematically review current literature on interventions targeted at staff views and attitudes of LGBTQ+ older people in care and identify gaps in knowledge to inform a future theory of change and identify potential interventions to address these.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This scoping review will be conducted in line with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. We will conduct a comprehensive search of electronic databases (ie, Social Services Abstracts, Social Care online, Sociological Abstracts, PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, ASSIA and Web of Science) focused on both health and social care literature to identify peer-reviewed literature as well as targeted online searches of potentially relevant grey literature. We will include literature published in the past 20 years (2003-2023) that report interventions to address care staff attitudes of LGBTQ+ populations older than 50 years who are receiving adult social care in a broad range of healthcare, residential or home settings. Citations will be screened by two independent researchers for inclusion and relevant data extracted using a bespoke template. Data will be analysed narratively and summarised to identify gaps in knowledge and aid in developing a theory of change.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

A priori registration on Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/v76ws.

摘要

介绍

先前的研究已经确定,由于工作人员对他们/他们的性和性别认同的看法和态度,女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿(LGBTQ+)社会护理服务使用者对他们的护理存在担忧和/或负面体验。这导致为这一人群提供社会护理存在许多障碍和挑战。然而,关于什么样的循证干预措施可以帮助克服这些障碍、增强知识并促进工作人员态度的积极转变,相关研究甚少。本综述的目的是系统地回顾针对护理中 LGBTQ+老年人的工作人员观点和态度的干预措施的现有文献,并确定知识空白,以为未来的变革理论提供信息,并确定潜在的干预措施来解决这些问题。

方法和分析

本范围综述将按照 Joanna Briggs 研究所的范围综述方法进行。我们将对电子数据库(即社会服务摘要、社会护理在线、社会学摘要、心理信息数据库、医学文献在线、 CINAHL、Scopus、ASSIA 和 Web of Science)进行全面搜索,重点关注健康和社会护理文献,以确定同行评议文献以及针对潜在相关灰色文献的有针对性的在线搜索。我们将纳入过去 20 年(2003-2023 年)发表的文献,这些文献报告了针对 50 岁以上接受广泛医疗保健、住宿或家庭护理的 LGBTQ+人群的护理工作人员态度的干预措施。两位独立研究人员将筛选引文以确定是否符合纳入标准,并使用定制模板提取相关数据。将对数据进行叙述性分析和总结,以确定知识空白,并帮助制定变革理论。

伦理和传播

不需要伦理批准。研究结果将通过在同行评议期刊上发表来传播。

综述注册

在开放科学框架上预先注册:https://osf.io/v76ws。

相似文献

1
Interventions addressing care staff views of older LGBTQ+ people in residential and homecare settings: a scoping review protocol.干预措施解决了居住和家庭护理环境中护理人员对老年 LGBTQ+人群的看法:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 23;14(10):e086497. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086497.
2
What is known about the LGBTQ perspective in child welfare services? A scoping review protocol.关于儿童福利服务中 LGBTQ 群体的观点,我们了解多少?一项范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 8;9(9):e030675. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030675.
3
Mapping the scientific literature on obstetrical and perinatal health among sexual and gender minoritised (SGM) childbearing people and their infants: a scoping review protocol.绘制性少数生育人群及其婴儿围产期健康相关的科学文献图谱:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 14;13(11):e075443. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075443.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Barriers and facilitators to mental health treatment access and engagement for LGBTQA+ people with psychosis: a scoping review protocol.LGBTQA+ 精神病患者获得和参与心理健康治疗的障碍和促进因素:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2024 May 30;13(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02566-5.
7
Mapping the current knowledge in syndemic research applied to men who have sex with men: a scoping review protocol.针对男男性行为者的综合征研究应用的现有知识图谱:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 27;10(11):e041238. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041238.
8
Cultural competence in fertility care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer people: a systematic review of patient and provider perspectives.生育护理中对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿群体的文化能力:对患者和提供者观点的系统回顾。
Fertil Steril. 2021 May;115(5):1294-1301. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.12.002. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
9
The impact of knowledge on attitudes of emergency department staff towards patients with substance related presentations: a quantitative systematic review protocol.知识对急诊科工作人员对待物质相关就诊患者态度的影响:一项定量系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):133-45. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2203.
10
Athletes' access to, attitudes towards and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: a scoping review protocol.运动员获取心理健康帮助的途径、态度和体验:系统综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e062279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062279.

本文引用的文献

1
Professional competences to promote healthy ageing across the lifespan: a scoping review.促进全生命周期健康老龄化的专业能力:一项范围综述
Eur J Ageing. 2023 Nov 24;20(1):45. doi: 10.1007/s10433-023-00794-7.
2
Sexual Minority Disparities in Subjective Cognitive Impairment: Do They Persist After Accounting for Psychological Distress?性少数群体在主观认知障碍方面的差异:在考虑到心理困扰后,这些差异是否仍然存在?
J Aging Health. 2023 Oct;35(9):727-735. doi: 10.1177/08982643231156286. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
3
Inequalities in older LGBT people's health and care needs in the United Kingdom: a systematic scoping review.
英国老年 LGBT 群体健康与护理需求的不平等:一项系统的范围综述。
Ageing Soc. 2021 Mar;41(3):493-515. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X19001326. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
4
Older lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex peoples' experiences and perceptions of receiving home care services in the community: A systematic review.老年男女同性恋、双性恋、变性者、酷儿和双性人在社区中接受家庭护理服务的体验和看法:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jun;118:103907. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103907. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
5
Reluctant educators and self-advocates: Older trans adults' experiences of health-care services and practitioners in seeking gender-affirming services.勉强为之的教育者和自我倡导者:年长跨性别成年人在寻求性别肯定服务时对医疗服务和从业者的体验。
Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):1231-1240. doi: 10.1111/hex.13104. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
6
Older LGBT+ health inequalities in the UK: setting a research agenda.英国老年 LGBT+健康不平等问题:制定研究议程。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 May;74(5):408-411. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-213068. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
7
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
8
Turning the Co-Production Corner: Methodological Reflections from an Action Research Project to Promote LGBT Inclusion in Care Homes for Older People.从促进老年护理院 LGBT 包容的行动研究项目中得到的方法学反思:共同生产的转变。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 7;15(4):695. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040695.
9
Developing inclusive residential care for older lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans (LGBT) people: An evaluation of the Care Home Challenge action research project.为老年女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者(LGBT)群体发展包容性住宿护理:养老院挑战行动研究项目评估
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Mar;26(2):e312-e320. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12521. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
10
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.Rayyan——一款用于系统评价的网络和移动应用程序。
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.