Sussman Tamara, Brotman Shari, MacIntosh Heather, Chamberland Line, MacDonnell Judith, Daley Andrea, Dumas Jean, Churchill Molly
School of Social Work, Faculty of Arts, McGill University.
Department of Sexology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal.
Can J Aging. 2018 Jun;37(2):121-132. doi: 10.1017/S0714980818000077. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
ABSTRACTIt is critical to ensure that long-term care (LTC) homes are sensitive to the needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) older adults. However, the extent to which the LTC home sector has adopted recommended strategies is unknown. This qualitative study reports findings from two initiatives: Semi-structured telephone interviews with Canadian LTC home administrators on strategies adopted to support LGBT inclusivity (n = 32), and discussions with participants attending a 2-day meeting on supporting LGBT inclusivity in LTC (n = 25). We found that LGBT inclusivity training was the most commonly adopted strategy among the LTC homes surveyed. Study findings further suggested that practices more visible to residents and families, such as LGBT-themed programming, inclusive language and symbols, or joint initiatives with LGBT communities, were less commonly adopted because of anticipated negative resident/family reactions. The importance and benefits of comprehensive strategies that include staff, residents, and family are discussed.
摘要
确保长期护理(LTC)机构能够满足女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别(LGBT)老年人的需求至关重要。然而,长期护理机构部门采用推荐策略的程度尚不清楚。这项定性研究报告了两项举措的结果:对加拿大长期护理机构管理人员进行半结构化电话访谈,了解为支持LGBT包容性而采取的策略(n = 32),以及与参加为期两天的关于在长期护理中支持LGBT包容性会议的参与者进行讨论(n = 25)。我们发现,LGBT包容性培训是接受调查的长期护理机构中最常采用的策略。研究结果还表明,由于预计会引起居民/家庭的负面反应,一些对居民和家庭来说更明显的做法,如LGBT主题活动、包容性语言和标志,或与LGBT社区的联合举措,较少被采用。文中讨论了涵盖工作人员、居民和家庭的综合策略的重要性和益处。