Bor Jacob, Fox Matthew P, Rosen Sydney, Venkataramani Atheendar, Tanser Frank, Pillay Deenan, Bärnighausen Till
Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS Med. 2017 Nov 28;14(11):e1002463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002463. eCollection 2017 Nov.
Loss to follow-up is high among HIV patients not yet receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). Clinical trials have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of early ART; however, these trials may miss an important real-world consequence of providing ART at diagnosis: its impact on retention in care.
We examined the effect of immediate (versus deferred) ART on retention in care using a regression discontinuity design. The analysis included all patients (N = 11,306) entering clinical HIV care with a first CD4 count between 12 August 2011 and 31 December 2012 in a public-sector HIV care and treatment program in rural South Africa. Patients were assigned to immediate versus deferred ART eligibility, as determined by a CD4 count < 350 cells/μl, per South African national guidelines. Patients referred to pre-ART care were instructed to return every 6 months for CD4 monitoring. Patients initiated on ART were instructed to return at 6 and 12 months post-initiation and annually thereafter for CD4 and viral load monitoring. We assessed retention in HIV care at 12 months, as measured by the presence of a clinic visit, lab test, or ART initiation 6 to 18 months after initial CD4 test. Differences in retention between patients presenting with CD4 counts just above versus just below the 350-cells/μl threshold were estimated using local linear regression models with a data-driven bandwidth and with the algorithm for selecting the bandwidth chosen ex ante. Among patients with CD4 counts close to the 350-cells/μl threshold, having an ART-eligible CD4 count (<350 cells/μl) was associated with higher 12-month retention than not having an ART-eligible CD4 count (50% versus 32%), an intention-to-treat risk difference of 18 percentage points (95% CI 11 to 23; p < 0.001). The decision to start ART was determined by CD4 count for one in four patients (25%) presenting close to the eligibility threshold (95% CI 20% to 31%; p < 0.001). In this subpopulation, having an ART-eligible CD4 count was associated with higher 12-month retention than not having an ART-eligible CD4 count (91% versus 21%), a complier causal risk difference of 70 percentage points (95% CI 42 to 98; p < 0.001). The major limitations of the study are the potential for limited generalizability, the potential for outcome misclassification, and the absence of data on longer-term health outcomes.
Patients who were eligible for immediate ART had dramatically higher retention in HIV care than patients who just missed the CD4-count eligibility cutoff. The clinical and population health benefits of offering immediate ART regardless of CD4 count may be larger than suggested by clinical trials.
在尚未接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的HIV患者中,失访率很高。临床试验已证明早期ART的临床疗效;然而,这些试验可能忽略了在诊断时提供ART的一个重要现实后果:其对治疗依从性的影响。
我们使用回归断点设计研究了即刻(与延迟)ART对治疗依从性的影响。分析纳入了2011年8月12日至2012年12月31日期间在南非农村公共部门HIV护理和治疗项目中首次CD4细胞计数进入临床HIV护理的所有患者(N = 11306)。根据南非国家指南,患者根据CD4细胞计数<350个/μl被分配到即刻与延迟ART资格组。被转诊至ART前护理的患者被指示每6个月返回进行CD4监测。开始接受ART的患者被指示在开始治疗后的6个月和12个月返回,此后每年返回进行CD4和病毒载量监测。我们通过首次CD4检测后6至18个月的门诊就诊、实验室检查或ART启动情况来评估12个月时的HIV护理依从性。使用具有数据驱动带宽且事先选择带宽选择算法的局部线性回归模型估计CD4细胞计数刚好高于与刚好低于350个/μl阈值的患者之间的依从性差异。在CD4细胞计数接近350个/μl阈值的患者中,具有符合ART标准的CD4细胞计数(<350个/μl)与12个月时更高的依从性相关,而不符合ART标准的CD4细胞计数则不然(50%对32%),意向性治疗风险差异为18个百分点(95%CI 11至23;p<0.001)。四分之一(25%)接近资格阈值的患者(95%CI 20%至31%;p<0.001)开始ART的决定由CD4细胞计数决定。在这个亚组中,具有符合ART标准的CD4细胞计数与12个月时更高的依从性相关,而不符合ART标准的CD4细胞计数则不然(91%对21%),依从者因果风险差异为70个百分点(95%CI 42至98;p<0.00