Division of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, N13W8, Sapporo 060-8628 Japan.
Division of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, N13W8, Sapporo 060-8628 Japan.
Water Res. 2018 Feb 1;129:460-469. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.043. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
Here, we evaluated the removal of three representative human enteric viruses - adenovirus (AdV) type 40, coxsackievirus (CV) B5, and hepatitis A virus (HAV) IB - and one surrogate of human caliciviruses - murine norovirus (MNV) type 1 - by coagulation-rapid sand filtration, using water samples from eight water sources for drinking water treatment plants in Japan. The removal ratios of a plant virus (pepper mild mottle virus; PMMoV) and two bacteriophages (MS2 and φX174) were compared with the removal ratios of human enteric viruses to assess the suitability of PMMoV, MS2, and φX174 as surrogates for human enteric viruses. The removal ratios of AdV, CV, HAV, and MNV, evaluated via the real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, were 0.8-2.5-log when commercially available polyaluminum chloride (PACl, basicity 1.5) and virgin silica sand were used as the coagulant and filter medium, respectively. The type of coagulant affected the virus removal efficiency, but the age of silica sand used in the rapid sand filtration did not. Coagulation-rapid sand filtration with non-sulfated, high-basicity PACls (basicity 2.1 or 2.5) removed viruses more efficiently than the other aluminum-based coagulants. The removal ratios of MS2 were sometimes higher than those of the three human enteric viruses and MNV, whereas the removal ratios of φX174 tended to be smaller than those of the three human enteric viruses and MNV. In contrast, the removal ratios of PMMoV were similar to and strongly correlated with those of the three human enteric viruses and MNV. Thus, PMMoV appears to be a suitable surrogate for human enteric viruses for the assessment of the efficacy of coagulation-rapid sand filtration to remove viruses.
在这里,我们评估了三种代表性的人类肠道病毒 - 腺病毒(AdV)型 40、柯萨奇病毒(CV)B5 和甲型肝炎病毒(HAV)IB - 以及一种人类杯状病毒的替代物 - 鼠诺如病毒(MNV)型 1 - 通过日本八家饮用水处理厂水源的混凝-快速砂滤去除。与人类肠道病毒的去除率相比,评估了一种植物病毒(辣椒斑驳病毒;PMMoV)和两种噬菌体(MS2 和 φX174)的去除率,以评估 PMMoV、MS2 和 φX174 作为人类肠道病毒替代物的适用性。通过实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法评估的 AdV、CV、HAV 和 MNV 的去除率分别为 0.8-2.5 个对数,当使用市售聚铝氯化物(PACl,碱度 1.5)和新的硅砂分别作为混凝剂和过滤介质时。混凝剂的类型影响病毒去除效率,但快速砂滤中使用的硅砂的年龄没有影响。用非硫酸盐化、高碱度 PACl(碱度 2.1 或 2.5)进行混凝-快速砂滤比其他铝基混凝剂更有效地去除病毒。MS2 的去除率有时高于三种人类肠道病毒和 MNV,而 φX174 的去除率往往小于三种人类肠道病毒和 MNV。相比之下,PMMoV 的去除率与三种人类肠道病毒和 MNV 相似且呈强相关性。因此,PMMoV 似乎是评估混凝-快速砂滤去除病毒效果的人类肠道病毒的合适替代物。