Alamin Md, Tsuji Shohei, Hata Akihiko, Hara-Yamamura Hiroe, Honda Ryo
Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Kanazawa University, Japan.
School of Environmental Design, Kanazawa University, Japan.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jun 1;823:153737. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153737. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
Since SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater is often present at low concentration or under detection limit, ensuring the reliability of detection processes using appropriate process controls is essential. The objective of this study was to evaluate applicability and limitations of candidate surrogate viruses as process controls under combinations of different virus concentration and RNA extraction methods. Detection efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 spiked in wastewater was compared with those of candidate surrogate viruses of bacteriophage ϕ6, pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV), F-specific coliphage (F-phage), and murine norovirus (MNV). After inactivated SARS-CoV-2 and ϕ6 were spiked in two different wastewaters, the viruses in solid and liquid fractions of wastewater were concentrated by centrifuge and polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation, respectively. Viral RNA was extracted by using QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit and 3 other commercially available extraction kits, then quantified by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR using CDCN1 assay. Regardless of extraction kits, SARS-CoV-2 was consistently detected with good efficiency from both liquid (11-200%) and solid fractions (7.1-93%). Among the candidate process controls, PMMoV was widely detected at good efficiencies from both liquid and solid fractions regardless of selection of RNA extraction kits. F-phage and MNV also showed good detection efficiencies in most combinations of wastewater fractions and RNA extraction kits. An enveloped virus ɸ6 was found often undetected or to have very low detection efficiency (0.1-4.2%) even when SARS-CoV-2 spiked in wastewater was detected with good efficiency. Consequently, PMMoV is widely applicable as process control for detection of SARS-CoV-2 either in liquid fractions concentrated by PEG precipitation, or in solid fractions concentrated by centrifuge.
由于废水中的SARS-CoV-2 RNA浓度通常较低或低于检测限,因此使用适当的过程控制来确保检测过程的可靠性至关重要。本研究的目的是评估候选替代病毒作为不同病毒浓度和RNA提取方法组合下的过程控制的适用性和局限性。将添加到废水中的SARS-CoV-2的检测效率与噬菌体ϕ6、辣椒轻斑驳病毒(PMMoV)、F特异性大肠杆菌噬菌体(F-噬菌体)和小鼠诺如病毒(MNV)的候选替代病毒的检测效率进行比较。将灭活的SARS-CoV-2和ϕ6添加到两种不同的废水中后,分别通过离心和聚乙二醇(PEG)沉淀浓缩废水中固体和液体部分的病毒。使用QIAamp Viral RNA Mini试剂盒和其他3种市售提取试剂盒提取病毒RNA,然后使用CDCN1测定法通过逆转录定量PCR进行定量。无论使用哪种提取试剂盒,从液体部分(11%-200%)和固体部分(7.1%-93%)都能始终高效地检测到SARS-CoV-2。在候选过程控制中,无论选择哪种RNA提取试剂盒,PMMoV在液体和固体部分都能以较高效率被广泛检测到。F-噬菌体和MNV在废水部分和RNA提取试剂盒的大多数组合中也显示出良好的检测效率。即使添加到废水中的SARS-CoV-2能被高效检测到,一种包膜病毒ϕ6也经常未被检测到或检测效率非常低(0.1%-4.2%)。因此,PMMoV广泛适用于作为检测SARS-CoV-2的过程控制,无论是在通过PEG沉淀浓缩的液体部分,还是在通过离心浓缩的固体部分。