Unsworth Carolyn A, Rawat Vijay, Sullivan John, Tay Richard, Naweed Anjum, Gudimetla Prasad
a Department of Exercise and Health Sciences, Central Queensland University , Melbourne , Australia.
b Department of Physiotherapy, University of Otago , Dunedin , New Zealand.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Feb;14(2):122-132. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1407829. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
The number of mobility aid users continues to rise as the population ages. While mobility aid users rely on public transport due to its affordability, evidence suggests access can be difficult. This study aims to describe people who use mobility aids to access public transport and the role of public transport access in influencing mobility aid choice.
Sixty-seven mobility aid users participated in telephone surveys which predominantly used a structured quantitative format. Data were analysed descriptively and any additional comments were simply categorized.
Thirty-six participants were female (54%), with a total sample mean age of 58.15 years (SD = 14.46). Seventy-two percent lived in metropolitan areas, 48% lived alone, and the sample experienced a variety of conditions including spinal cord injury (37%) and arthritis (18%). Sixty-four percent of all respondents used two or more mobility aids including powered wheelchairs, scooters and walking frames. The most important features when choosing a mobility aid were reliability, turning ability and size. Fifty-two percent of all respondents strongly agreed that public transport is generally accessible.
While work continues to ensure that public transport vehicles and stations are fully accessible, mobility aid users must manage current infrastructure and access a system which has been shown through this research to have many limitations. Mobility aid users, vendors and health professionals need to work together to identify mobility aids that fulfil needs, and are reliable and safe, so that mobility aid users are both "visible and seen" when accessing the public transport network. Implications for rehabilitation Some mobility aid users experience difficulties accessing and using public transport and further research is required to ensure the whole public transport network is fully accessible to people using mobility aids. Many people have more than one seated mobility aid, suggesting people can choose different aids for different purposes and environments. Health professionals may need to increase their involvement in assisting individuals to select and use mobility aids.
随着人口老龄化,行动辅助器具使用者的数量持续上升。尽管行动辅助器具使用者因公共交通价格实惠而依赖它,但有证据表明使用起来可能困难重重。本研究旨在描述使用行动辅助器具搭乘公共交通的人群,以及公共交通可达性在影响行动辅助器具选择方面所起的作用。
67名行动辅助器具使用者参与了电话调查,调查主要采用结构化定量形式。对数据进行描述性分析,任何额外评论仅进行分类。
36名参与者为女性(54%),样本总平均年龄为58.15岁(标准差 = 14.46)。72%的人居住在大城市地区,48%的人独居,样本患有多种疾病,包括脊髓损伤(37%)和关节炎(18%)。所有受访者中有64%使用两种或更多行动辅助器具,包括电动轮椅、踏板车和步行架。选择行动辅助器具时最重要的特征是可靠性、转向能力和尺寸。所有受访者中有52%强烈认同公共交通总体上是可达的。
虽然仍在努力确保公共交通车辆和车站完全可达,但行动辅助器具使用者必须应对现有基础设施,并接入一个经本研究证明存在诸多限制的系统。行动辅助器具使用者、供应商和健康专业人员需要共同努力,确定能满足需求且可靠安全的行动辅助器具,以便行动辅助器具使用者在使用公共交通网络时“既被看见又被留意到”。对康复的启示 一些行动辅助器具使用者在使用和搭乘公共交通方面遇到困难,需要进一步研究以确保整个公共交通网络对使用行动辅助器具的人完全可达。许多人拥有不止一种坐式行动辅助器具,这表明人们可以根据不同目的和环境选择不同的辅助器具。健康专业人员可能需要更多地参与协助个人选择和使用行动辅助器具。