Kapsalis Efthimis, Jaeger Nils, Hale Jonathan
Department of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Apr;19(3):604-622. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2111723. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
Despite the increase of users of Mobility Assistive Devices (MobAD), there has been a lack of accessibility in urban environments in many parts of the world. We present a systematic review of how the inaccessible design of public spaces affects quality-of-life - including aspects of health and safety, independence, and social participation - of MobAD users.
We conducted a literature search in three databases (i.e., Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed) and initially discovered 3980 publications. We analysed 48 peer-reviewed journal articles published in English from 2005 to 2021 and assessed their quality of evidence the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
Findings indicated a substantial number of inaccessible elements for MobAD users in public spaces. Pathway characteristics, boarding ramps, entrance features, confined spaces, and service surfaces were deemed to be the least accessible elements. These barriers had multifaceted effects on MobAD users' quality of life with aspects of physical health, mobility, and use of public transport being most affected.
Notwithstanding that the reviewed studies mostly ocused on wheelchair users residing in high-income countries, this review outlines the critical role of the design of the built environment as a factor of disablement for MobAD users. We conclude by highlighting a few recommendations for future research and practice, especially inclusive approaches and adaptive techniques to assist MobAD users with performing tasks in public spaces independently.Implications for RehabilitationUsers of Mobility Assistive Devices experience a lack of accessibility provisions in public open spaces and buildings internationally.Physical barriers in public spaces substantially diminish the health and safety, autonomy, and social participation of users of Mobility Assistive Devices.There is a definite need for the adoption of inclusive strategies and adaptive techniques in placemaking processes so that users of Mobility Assistive Devices can have equitable access to public spaces.
尽管移动辅助设备(MobAD)的用户数量有所增加,但世界上许多地方的城市环境仍缺乏无障碍设施。我们对公共空间的无障碍设计如何影响MobAD用户的生活质量进行了系统综述,包括健康与安全、独立性和社会参与等方面。
我们在三个数据库(即Scopus、科学网和PubMed)中进行了文献检索,初步发现了3980篇出版物。我们分析了2005年至2021年以英文发表的48篇同行评审期刊文章,并使用混合方法评估工具评估了它们的证据质量。
研究结果表明,公共空间中存在大量对MobAD用户来说无法进入的元素。道路特征、登机坡道、入口特征、狭窄空间和服务表面被认为是最难以进入的元素。这些障碍对MobAD用户的生活质量产生了多方面的影响,其中身体健康、行动能力和公共交通使用方面受到的影响最大。
尽管所审查的研究大多集中在高收入国家的轮椅使用者身上,但本综述概述了建筑环境设计作为MobAD用户致残因素的关键作用。我们最后强调了一些对未来研究和实践的建议,特别是包容性方法和适应性技术,以帮助MobAD用户在公共空间中独立完成任务。对康复的启示移动辅助设备的用户在国际上的公共开放空间和建筑物中体验到无障碍设施的缺乏。公共空间中的物理障碍极大地降低了移动辅助设备用户的健康与安全、自主性和社会参与度。在场所营造过程中,绝对需要采用包容性策略和适应性技术,以便移动辅助设备的用户能够公平地使用公共空间。