Buxbaum Laurel J
Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute.
Psychol Rev. 2017 Apr;124(3):346-360. doi: 10.1037/rev0000051.
The reasoning-based approach championed by Francois Osiurak and Arnaud Badets (Osiurak & Badets, 2016) denies the existence of sensory-motor memories of tool use except in limited circumstances, and suggests instead that most tool use is subserved solely by online technical reasoning about tool properties. In this commentary, I highlight the strengths and limitations of the reasoning-based approach and review a number of lines of evidence that manipulation knowledge is in fact used in tool action tasks. In addition, I present a "two route" neurocognitive model of tool use called the "Two Action Systems Plus (2AS+)" framework that posits a complementary role for online and stored information and specifies the neurocognitive substrates of task-relevant action selection. This framework, unlike the reasoning based approach, has the potential to integrate the existing psychological and functional neuroanatomic data in the tool use domain. (PsycINFO Database Record
弗朗索瓦·奥西拉克（Francois Osiurak）和阿诺德·巴代（Arnaud Badets）所倡导的基于推理的方法（奥西拉克和巴代，2016年）否认工具使用存在感觉运动记忆，除非在有限的情况下，相反，它认为大多数工具使用仅由关于工具属性的在线技术推理来支持。在这篇评论中，我强调了基于推理的方法的优点和局限性，并回顾了一些证据，这些证据表明操作知识实际上被用于工具动作任务中。此外，我提出了一个工具使用的“双路径”神经认知模型，称为“双动作系统加（2AS+）”框架，该框架假定在线信息和存储信息具有互补作用，并指定了与任务相关的动作选择的神经认知基础。与基于推理的方法不同，这个框架有潜力整合工具使用领域中现有的心理学和功能性神经解剖学数据。（PsycINFO数据库记录）
